-
So we are now at 6 players drafted in the Top 9 rounds
Seems like we are recruiting fairly well
and still no Hines/Dirtbag/Hugesak/Hardin
Walk like the King or walk like you don't care who the King is
-
MLB scouts know their business
-
Hardin would be great to have back. That's 40 to 50 quality innings. Huge.
Hujsak needs to claim Long COVID made Lemons bench him for a year, then point to Hancock's horrible numbers, "see, my coach was not thinking right, I was basically red-shirted"
-
Originally Posted by
Coach34
Seems like we are recruiting fairly well
and still no Hines/Dirtbag/Hugesak/Hardin
Just shows how much the coaching leaves to be desired (Parker excluded)
-
Last edited by Coach34; 07-16-2024 at 10:32 AM.
Walk like the King or walk like you don't care who the King is
-
Originally Posted by
sandjunky
Just shows how much the coaching leaves to be desired (Parker excluded)
Dirtbag? Great season
Hugesak? Great season
Chance? Overachiever of the year in the SEC
Kohler? Hurt all year but hit .300 down the stretch
Downs? Hit .300 but hurt half the season
Jordan? Struck out too much but still hit .350 with 20 bombs
Hines and Larry played below expectations
Looks like the coaching is pretty good. We finished 5th in the SEC. Do you think our line-up was Top 5 in talent? (The correct answer is no)
Walk like the King or walk like you don't care who the King is
-
Parker got the pitchers bank. None of them would've been a top 10 round guy except maybe Dohm and the one guy who couldn't get an out. Maybe Loo falls later. Jordan fell big. Hines still isn't drafted. Take out the pitchers and it's really weak. Foxhall recruited well? Couldn't coach a damn lick. Gaut hasn't done squat recruiting wise.
Last edited by Cooterpoot; 07-15-2024 at 07:20 PM.
-
Originally Posted by
Coach34
Dirtbag? Great season
Hugesak? Great season
Chance? Overachiever of the year in the SEC
Kohler? Hurt all year but hit .300 down the stretch
Downs? Hit .300 but hurt half the season
Jordan? Struck out too much but still hit .350 with 20 bombs
Hines and Larry played below expectations
Looks like the coaching is pretty good. We finished 5th in the SEC. Do you think our line-up was Top 5 in talent? (The correct answer is no)
How was that coaching in '22 and '23? To hear you say it we were the "murder's row" 1927 NYY or the '75 Big Red machine, you know all this talent we have. Good thing those teams weren't coached by Lemonz......
Last edited by Saltydog; 07-15-2024 at 07:44 PM.
"The QB and the receiver weren't on the same page there, but hey its only week eleven". (Jack Cristil)
-
Originally Posted by
Cooterpoot
Parker got the pitchers bank. None of them would've been a top 10 round guy except maybe Dohm and the one guy who couldn't get an out. Maybe Loo falls later. Jordan fell big. Hines still isn't drafted. Take out the pitchers and it's really weak. Foxhall recruited well? Couldn't coach a damn lick. Gaut hasn't done squat recruiting wise.
Jerk would have come on- you could see in 23 he just needed experience. He was a preseason Top 150 guy. Purdue is where you could see the improvement. Dohm actually fell lower than expected- but that was arm health concerns and nothing else.
Hines screwed himself trying to pull everything. DJ needs another year of college and everybody sees that- even the pros. But he is too talented not to take. And even with DJ- his numbers were alot better this year than his Freshman year
Last edited by Coach34; 07-15-2024 at 08:27 PM.
Walk like the King or walk like you don't care who the King is
-
Dakota is so talented. But for someone who is a great athlete supposedly, he does not steal bases well or play great defense. He strikes out too much, is guilty of trying to do too much, and does not make adjustments at the plate very well. He needs development. Development can happen in the minors, or at the college level. But I think he is a good pick in the 4th round.
-
Originally Posted by
somebodyshotmypaw
Dakota is so talented. But for someone who is a great athlete supposedly, he does not steal bases well or play great defense. He strikes out too much, is guilty of trying to do too much, and does not make adjustments at the plate very well. He needs development. Development can happen in the minors, or at the college level. But I think he is a good pick in the 4th round.
Dude is the truth and supreme athlete. A slump doesn't define what he's done
-
Hopefully he's coachable in the minors
-
Originally Posted by
bulldawg28
Dude is the truth and supreme athlete. A slump doesn't define what he's done
If he can't hit a college breaking ball...I don't know. He's certainly athletic enough to do it. Hopefully someone can help him figure it out in the minors. No doubt he can hit a fastball though.
-
Safe to say, we will not have 9 next year.
And we did not get past a regional this year with this team.
-
Bottom line is we've got to get big time hitters on campus and we just haven't consistently done it. Hopefully this portal crop proves fruitful & hopefully Gaut gets his crap together a bit.
-
A year ago, the narrative was that Fox handled everything pitching, so Lemo wasn't responsible for any issues there. Now, our success in pitching is proof Lemo is a good recruiter. Can't have it both ways
More to the point, finishing 5th in the SEC is fine, but not wining a regional was an underperformance. There are not 16 teams with more players drafted.
-
So just looked at it. TN had 8 guys drafted, LSU 7. Then we're in a 6 way tie for 3rd with Arky, Vandy, Oklahoma State, Oklahoma, and Florida state.
Pretty rough to just use this, but we certainly had to 10-15 range talent. Which is great that Lemo got them here (though the Pitchers were on Fox), but not so great that he couldn't make it out of a regional.
Doesn't really matter. Everyone agrees he's gotta win next year
-
Originally Posted by
the_real_MSU_is_us
A year ago, the narrative was that Fox handled everything pitching, so Lemo wasn't responsible for any issues there. Now, our success in pitching is proof Lemo is a good recruiter. Can't have it both ways
More to the point, finishing 5th in the SEC is fine, but not wining a regional was an underperformance. There are not 16 teams with more players drafted.
We had no hitters or bullpen. We were a one trick pony and our saddle was on our starting pitching.
-
Originally Posted by
Cooterpoot
We had no hitters or bullpen. We were a one trick pony and our saddle was on our starting pitching.
Exactly
We have now had 8 players drafted- 6 of them are pitchers
Hardin in the 12th
Hugesack in the 13th
Walk like the King or walk like you don't care who the King is
-
Originally Posted by
the_real_MSU_is_us
So just looked at it. TN had 8 guys drafted, LSU 7. Then we're in a 6 way tie for 3rd with Arky, Vandy, Oklahoma State, Oklahoma, and Florida state.
Pretty rough to just use this, but we certainly had to 10-15 range talent. Which is great that Lemo got them here (though the Pitchers were on Fox), but not so great that he couldn't make it out of a regional.
Doesn't really matter. Everyone agrees he's gotta win next year
So in the same talent range as #1 knocked out by #4 Arky, 2 and q 2 seed Vandy; #1 knocked out by #3 Oklahoma; #1 knocked out by #3 OSU; and a CWS team.
Again, it shows how drafted talent is not necessarily a marker for how you do in the post season.
"After dealing with Ole Miss for over a year," he said, "I've learned to expect their leadership to do and say things that the leadership at other Division I schools would never consider doing and to justify their actions by reminding themselves that "We're Ole Miss.""
- Tom Mars, Esq. 4.9.18
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.