Knew they were itching to get damn Clemson ranked. UTSA what a damn joke.
Printable View
Knew they were itching to get damn Clemson ranked. UTSA what a damn joke.
Just gives our guys extra motivation. Always play better with a chip on our shoulders
This is so great.
This is locker room motivation
Ole miss is also #9
I?m estatic cause this is what I wanted
We play bad ranked recently
DGAF.
Just win!
Probably can blame Auburn for this.
Why does it matter?? If we win we finish in the top 25 if we lose we don't. So it mean zero.
This year is extra interesting....
EVERY CFP Top 10 team has a realistic shot at getting in the playoffs...except #9 Mississippi...
It's great to have so much parity in college football... isn't it a wonderful product?:rolleyes:
The Citrus is probably the worst bowl scenario for Ole Miss so they'll have a nice bowl regardless of Thursday's outcome. We need to make sure that while they're traveling to that bowl game all they can think about is the ass whipping they received in the Egg Bowl along with the knowledge of how bad they are going to get beat in the bowl with their (former) head coach in Miami and their star quarterback in Cali training for the draft.
It?s bs to be ranked, destroy an opponent, and drop out of ranking. This is the biggest issue with a human opinion based system. You can never eliminate biases 100%.
Are there 12 championship worthy teams? I think 8 is the most I?d consider just for the quality of the games, plus it only extends the season by 1 more week. 5 P5 champions, 3 at large positions. I?m ok with using the BCS for ranking.
Has it been said that the BCS system still chose the same NCG teams almost every year as the CFP? Seems like I?ve heard that before.
I have to admit, I had to eat some crow. I felt like we would get 6 plus a bowl game.
Like button push 👆🏼👆🏼👆🏼
Without a doubt
Agree 👆🏼👆🏼👆🏼
I?m not necessarily advocating the BCS, but a transparent model without human opinion.