How in the world has this thread not been locked? I thought we were a MSU/Sports site. This reads like something on Sixpack.
Printable View
Israel was mentioned as they are a historical figure of what not to do! We are supposed to learn from history, but apparently not given some of the posts!
Sorry this has wandered from spots related info.:confused:
I just got off the boat from my cruise to this mess....
Lovely.
How is paying more taxes because you make more money a moral issue? And morals are not determined by socioeconomic status. Either you are a good person and try your best to live the right way or you don?t. If people don?t live by their morals and exhibit good character, then people may find themselves caught up in the criminal element of society. It?s all about their decisions. Just like a decision to take precautions to prevent a pregnancy so you won?t have to abort. And yes, prevention should be easy because some methods are free or very cheap. Decisions decisions.
Ha ha. I try to keep it civil. Buts it’s like this: gameday to breaking windows, to bad parents, to no morals, to abortion, to God and Israelites. It all ties together!!! We have crime because of bad parents, no morals, or having God being the compass in our life!! Ha!!!!
No you have it backwards. The original ruling left it up to individual people to decide what's right. This ruling now stripped that decision and is opening the door for more government involvement.
You sound like a "the United States are" instead of a "the United States is" type of person and if that's the case then your state should just secede and see how long it lasts without Federal welfare distribution. Good luck.
Sorry you are wrong. The original ruling brought the federal government into something it should have never been in the first place. You need to brush up on the constitution and enumerated powers. That’s the problem with the fed gov., they stick their nose into things they are not supposed to and just cause more problems. Why bring up succession? Not one person here has mentioned that. Would suit me if they got rid of welfare. Would put a lot of lazy people to work and make the states more responsible with money when it comes to hand outs. Would keep the federal gov from using programs to buy votes too.
The state of Mississippi would not survive without federal subsidies and welfare.
And again Roe v. Wade was the fed gov saying people have personal privacy and rights to their bodies (in more than just abortions). This blocked governments (fed, state, county) from intervening in these PERSONAL decisions.
I don't know how you see it as anything but opening the door for MORE government regulation. You have to be willfully misunderstanding it at this point.