50% of 7th graders? where you hear that?
Printable View
There's no logic to hiring Sark over Leach. None whatsoever.
People in decision making positions have to justify their hirings. They can't just throw crap at the wall and keep their job.
There's not a single bit of logic to hiring Sark over Leach that you could justify to a university president.
If the rules are "don't smoke weed", then I have no problem with a player being booted for smoking weed. Why is it wrong to hold people accountable?
I wouldn't have hired Sark over Leach at the time. You have to be careful hiring Bama assistants. Cohen got fooled by Moorhead and didn't realize how much talent Moorhead was working with at Penn State.
Leach can win here if he will adapt. If he continues to blame personnel and execution like you do as a dense poster, he will fail.
This is 17n message board dude.
My point was Sark's offense is looking good. Leach's not so much. If you want to talk real, I can get Cohen being apprehensive about hiring Sark given his exit at USC. However, you are being illogical regarding Sark for the sole purpose of defending your coach crush. Sark took over a UW team that had 5 losing seasons prior, which included a 0-12 season. He had one decent year at USC and won 8 games, calling plays drunk. He has a .550 winning percentage as a HC. Leach is .600 as a HC.
We all know the reality is that Leach better workout because State is stuck with Leach 3-4 years. It has been duly noted that you're 100 a Leach guy. You don't have to run to his defense anytime someone has a thought to the contrary regarding Leach. We will all find out in 3-4 years if the Leach era is a good one. 2020...so far,the air-raid is a paper airplane.
However, you have already said this summer.... it was illogical for State to be ONLY slight favorites v Arkansas and a dog v UK for the 2020 year. You were wrong and being an illogical fan.
The fact that people are mad that kids are held accountable and face consequences due to breaking rules is perplexing. Microcosm of society I guess.
He may have failed at being nice to booster's kids but he did not fail at winning at TTech.
2000 7-6
2001 7-6
2002 9-5
2003 8-5
2004 8-4
2005 9-3
2006 8-5
2007 9-4
2008 11-2
2009 8-4 didn't coach bowl but they won on his system so 9-4.
I'm not sure if he will win at State or not but to say he failed at TTech is simply not true with regards to winning and losing.