He isn't very smart.....
Printable View
N E double-K by God I D
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=achROqQBP9g
There's quite a few different ways you're wrong here. Choose your own adventure argument:
You want to impose on people's freedom of speech?
Why are you mad about something that happens every single college football game? People go to the game painted up and not wearing shirts all the time. What makes you concerned with this instance?
Why even bring up children? Bodily functions and sex are normal human processes. Studies show that actual sex education helps LOWER teen pregnancy rate. Yet you want to continue like it's "out of sight / out of mind" and then get shocked when 14 y/o Susan and 15 y/o Tommy have an accident.
You are correct Matt on all accounts.
Concerning that so many see no issues with this but not surprising. Shows the moral relativism of culture where there is no right or wrong just however I see it.
Just because something is legal doesn't make it right. Abortion legal isn't right. The Dredd Scott case and slavery was wrong even though it was legal for a time. There are moral absolutes, we just hope our laws will reflect that but many times they do not.
I don't think women should got topless to sporting events. Maybe I'm a prude, or old-fashioned, or just a bad parent. But I don't think women should go topless to sporting events. I don't like nudity in public, and I consider it nudity. But maybe since I don't teach my kids that nudity is okay, my son will wind up pregnant soon (men getting pregnant is a thing now I hear).
I think both ladies in this instance have more like what we'd call blisters and not big uns.
Just a matter of courtesy. If you want to hang out with your wang out around your kids, whatever. It's still bad form to do it in public generally. Certainly women going topless is less of a faux pas, but in the US it's still mostly considered rude for women to go topless in areas that aren't designated as topless, and even more so if it's in an area with kids. Even in places where topless beaches are common, you still generally see women wearing tops around town.
ETA: Obviously I personally rebel at society's unreasonable strictures on women and encourage them to free the tatas whenever and wherever, provided the women in question are reasonably attractive.
My My
Kinda of a dumb question.....
Choose your own argument to lose:
1. Women are people. They are not objects. To treat a person as an object is so inherently evil and wicked, you might as well go over to the Middle East where that dogma is taught. Here, Jesus loves people. He loves everyone. No one is an object in His eyes.
2. Women gawk over shirtless guys all the time. Just because something isn't sexual to you, doesn't mean it's not an object of sexual pleasure to someone else.
3. If "object of sexual pleasure" is the standard by which something should be covered up, why does you mom ever show her face? I use that face for my sexual desires all the time. Cover it up.
But really, you should stop posting on the internet. Every post you make contributes to a worse society. Go offline and yell at the sky. It's better for you and everyone else. Thanks n
I mean I understand that women find a well defined chest w/ abs "sexually appealing" as well. Seems you are forgetting that there is more than satisfying the male gaze here. Society shouldn't be built strictly for men and make women as objects. We've progressed the last 200+ years to show that.