OM was 5-7 (1-7) this year. We gave rings for beating them? Jeez
Printable View
OM was 5-7 (1-7) this year. We gave rings for beating them? Jeez
Did baseball get rings for winning SBW?
That’s embarrassing. Moorehead will go down as our second worst coaching hire ever.
Didn't some on here bash Dan for not taking the Egg Bowl seriously enough after about 2012? Well Moorhead is damn sure taking it seriously by giving out bling and now people are bashing. Some of y'all just can't be pleased.***
I have no problem with this. Incentivize the hell out of beating them. I like it.
People complaining about this are beyond out of touch
I heard we got rings for beating Jimbo Fisher.
That is just embarrassing. Can you imagine what we'd be saying if Ole Miss did that?
Rings for beating Mississippi?
https://media.giphy.com/media/l0Hlvt...usKs/giphy.gif
Well we love to complain, so probably smn like "they put more emphasis on the game than we do and that's why they beat us. Luke hates state and will always put a huge emphasis on the egg bowl. Joe better start showing some emotion. Howland too damn it."
How's that?
Dan Mullen put the attendance of the 2010 spring game as the egg bowl score, said he was never losing to Ole Miss again, had a countdown clock, told everyone that rival schools were making things up about him wanting to leave, called Ole Miss “the school up north”, and claimed winning bowl games like the Liberty Bowl and Music City Bowl as us “winning championships”. Joe Moorhead never says a word about them until it is game week and never stirs up any drama with them that is unnecessary. That ring also has “Outback Bowl” written on it. How dare Joe try to do something nice for his players.
If we sweep them in baseball I'd be for giving baseball a ring too.
Since they do not have to pay millions in attorney fees to defend us from the NCAA, the MSU Athletic Department to spend the excess cash on something.******
This amazes me. If we lose to them this board melts and wants to clear house but if we beat them in our biggest rivalry game and reward our players with hardware for doing so it's a participation trophy.
I always thought a participation trophy was given to losers to make them feel better. Last I checked we won the egg bowl
I guess if this is stupid then having a name and a trophy for the game is stupid.
I have no issue at all with this. Whatever it takes to motivate them to whip that butt every year.
What if we went 1-11 and they were our only win? Do we still do the ring thing?
I know they're our rival, and it matters a lot to win that game, but beating them shouldn't define our season. I absolutely hated when Dan would say "he could go 1-11 and as long as our 1 win was OM, he'd be loved"...I just think that makes us look small as hell. Beating your rival IS important, but so is taking steps forward as a program, playing in NYD bowls, access bowls, etc.
My 2 cents.
Im fine with it. If we wouldve lost yall wouldve wanted to fire him. I guess some people will hate on him no matter what. I promise you the kids loved it
Yet another example of Moorehead being a clown show. OM was freaking terrible, we underachieved, and he gave out rings? God he is terrible
I’m not. Screw that. Give a ring for amazing play for the season. I’m like 7 I’m sick of motivation by participation trophies. Produce Excellence and be rewarded by excellence.
My child gets a C in school they ain’t getting a trophy they getting hell from dad! Praise mediocrity you get it. Raise the bar and expectations. Demand it.