Who would you run out there this week?
Also, Hatcher was good in limited duty last year and is 91-94. Why is he not an option? Same with Cumbest, hell he can do everything else. Mangum maybe?
Printable View
Who would you run out there this week?
Also, Hatcher was good in limited duty last year and is 91-94. Why is he not an option? Same with Cumbest, hell he can do everything else. Mangum maybe?
Hatcher can’t hit 90. He’s low 80’s.
That's not what Cohen told jim on the radio last week. Maybe there is somebody else not pitching who is low 90s and he confused the two?Quote:
Originally Posted by Steakonastick
Really Wish McCleod would be healing up. Guy was looking like a difference maker in the fall
Hatcher seemed like just a late innings guy last year in blow outs, doubt he's even been in a bullpen since Lemonis has been here
We had Sunday issues in 2016 too and eventually settled in for the position, I'm thinking we'll be ok but we'll see.
Move JT there. If we are not going to play defense on saturdays.
Keegan and Barlow allowed 0 runs on Sunday. I would go Keegan-Barlow-Gordon.Quote:
Originally Posted by confucius say
So what’s the deal with McCleod? Is it really mono or is it something bigger?
Spring, James, Barlow and whatever is left
Well, its not like we are going to face 7 lefties in the lineup either.Quote:
Originally Posted by HoopsDawg
Hatcher is a soft tossed. Big time.Quote:
Originally Posted by confucius say
Quote:
Originally Posted by TNDawg35
Redshirting last I heard.
Yea that's what steak said too. I must've heard Cohen wrong or he was talking about somebody else other than HatcherQuote:
Originally Posted by Homedawg
Gunner was drafted as a pitcher why not give a Him a shot
I think he will go Plumlee, Keegan, and then whoever else after that.
I'm not as worried about the pitching as I am in the infield to be honest with you. I think we need to start Hatcher at first for the time being and hope it helps.
The problem isn't that we have guys that can pitch well. The problem is it's never the same ones every week. Except for a few.Quote:
Originally Posted by HoopsDawg
why not start Cole and move Keegan to closer.
Keegan to closer, hmmm. that is interesting.Quote:
Originally Posted by tcdog70
I've thought about that and my concern is Cole starting wasn't very good.Quote:
Originally Posted by tcdog70
What happened to Breaux????????
He wasn't, but he also wasn't very good as a closer or relief guy until late last year. I don't know if starting him would be a good move, but I wouldn't avoid it b/c of his past experience as a starter.Quote:
Originally Posted by Todd4State
I got nervous just reading thatQuote:
Originally Posted by tcdog70
Starting to think we'll never see him again, BreauxQuote:
Originally Posted by Duckdog
ThisQuote:
Originally Posted by CadaverDawg
How does Beaux even have a spot on the roster? Was there just no one else and they needed to make the numbers work?
This is what some didn't realize with Billingsley. Although he wasn't a great starter you knew what you were going to get with him. He may struggle and put a lot of runners on, but he would generally get out of it and allow only 2 or 3 runs and give you 5-6 innings. That's enough to win on a Sunday.
That's why I still think our best bet is roll with Plumlee. He may not be the best, but you know exactly what he's gonna give you and he's able to go 5-6 innings. After that I think you go Keegan, Self, and Gordon to close. Keegan has good enough stuff to get you a couple of innings and Self has shown he can be electric in one inning of work. Would've gotten out of the jam Friday night if Tanner Allen wouldn't have screwed up the play.
He's been dressed. So why keep him around????Quote:
Originally Posted by Dawg2003
Not sure.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dawg2003
he is a different pitcher now. Damn just give it a shot.. if it doesn't work go back. He could have started Sunday and tried for about 3 innings. we wasted Him sitting in the dugout.Quote:
Originally Posted by Todd4State