SEC refs would not have allowed MSU a win over KY in that manner in a million years.
SEC refs would not have allowed MSU a win over KY in that manner in a million years.
You're right, it would not have been good had it been us doing it, but it was good nevertheless. Good win by LSU.
Kentucky got screwed and I LOVE IT!!!!!!
I don't think they were screwed. Wasn't goal tending.
How did they get screwed?Quote:
Originally Posted by Dawg-gone-dawgs
That was legit. But KY lost... what else matters??
If was offensive goal tending. Pretty obviousQuote:
Originally Posted by LC Dawg
It definitely wasn't obvious.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dawg-gone-dawgs
So the ball can be in the cylinder and be messed with?Quote:
Originally Posted by LC Dawg
The only place that wasn’t offensive goal tending is Europe or Olympics.Quote:
Originally Posted by LC Dawg
I don't think it was in the cylinder. Really don't care. I enjoy seeing Kentucky get beat.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dawg-gone-dawgs
That was kind of my point but there are those in every crowd....Quote:
Originally Posted by LC Dawg
Good talk.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dawg-gone-dawgs
Yes. It was as obvious as the PI in the rams saints game.Quote:
Originally Posted by LC Dawg
It?s not a matter of you thinking it was or it was not. Facts and video dont lie, no matter how much you want to think something was.Quote:
Originally Posted by LC Dawg
It was not goal tending. Plainly obvious it wasn?tQuote:
Originally Posted by RougeDawg
If you don't think that was goaltending you are either blind or do not know the rule. It was textbook goaltending.Quote:
Originally Posted by MrKotter
Good grief, some of you people just want to argue. I'm glad to see KY get beat also but that ball was pushed back in with nearly half the ball still in the cylinder. OBVIOUS goaltend per the rules that would have been called if we had done that especially against KY.Quote:
Originally Posted by LC Dawg
I have an optometrist I can recommend.Quote:
Originally Posted by MrKotter
It was offensive basket interference because it was still in the cylinder but they couldn’t review that. They could only review that he touched it before the clock expired.
It’s okay because LSU is going to get hammered. LSU is buying Watford this year. They bought Reid, Williams, and Days last year.
This is not in the cylinder.
It was not a goal tend.
[tweet]https://twitter.com/SBNationCBB/status/1095511163926970369[/tweet]
FullSizeRender.jpg
Kentucky player had a hand inside the rim on the shot so it?s even
If you look closely uk had a defensive goaltending first. Now I agree it was tougher to see, but Washington reaches through the basket and touched the rim. So there's that.Quote:
Originally Posted by maroonmania
Sorry shotgun, but in college basketball the cylinder is upward to the roof. It doesn't have to be literally touching the rim. If there were replay and uk hadn't goal tended first, which I say they did, that basket doesn't count.Quote:
Originally Posted by ShotgunDawg
It would be simpler if they went to international rule that if it's not on the rim, it's good to touch. But that's not how it is at present.
Yes, agree with that.Quote:
Originally Posted by Homedawg
Not sure what is going on with people tonight but the picture you have shows that clearly AT LEAST 1/3 of the ball is in the cylinder. The rule is if ANY part of the ball is in the cylinder its basket interference. If a defender grabbed the ball from that position LSU fans would have gone nuts. The rule is NOT that the ENTIRE ball must be in the cylinder. They just let a lot of it go these days because so much of basketball is played above the rim but that is CLEAR textbook offensive basket interference.Quote:
Originally Posted by ShotgunDawg
If I understand what was said, you can only review the time not the offensive goaltend but as a State fan they would of ruled it off
Correct, which took place right after the defensive goal tending. LSU wins. Bad call twice by the officials. Bet result, the correct team wonQuote:
Originally Posted by maroonmania
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dawgcap
No they wouldn't. Not based on the clock no.
I don’t think a offensive goaltending is reviewableQuote:
Originally Posted by Homedawg
Neither are reviewable. Offensive or defensive. So back to my original pointQuote:
Originally Posted by Dawgcap
All the ref were looking at was did the shot get off. Period. Nothing else was reviewable
That clears it up for me. I see that shot and say "the ball is OUTSIDE the rim" (half of the ball). ANY part of the ball...got it.Quote:
Originally Posted by maroonmania
It was sarcasm but if we tip that in some other rule comes under effect but then again offensive goaltending is called initially! Can’t believe LSU even got that call at Rupp
We actually agree more than you think!! Haha But if we tipped that against Kentucky or any other SEC school I bet offensive goaltending was called. No need for review then! That’s my pessimist viewQuote:
Originally Posted by Homedawg
Ha ha ha ha. Every commentator and talking head said it was offensive goal tending. Even the overhead camera angle provides indisputable video evidence.Quote:
Originally Posted by MrKotter
As many times as we got screwed by bad calls playing them, I hope no one is feeling sorry for those 17ers whether it was a bad call or not.