Where was the learning curve with the new offense?
Printable View
Where was the learning curve with the new offense?
well, Kellen Mond was an actual quarterback when A&M recruited him..
You better go to bed or put on your maroon colored glasses or you are asking for it.****
Go back and look at TAMU recruiting rankings to find your answer. While your doing that, go look at Florida's.
People have zero clue about talent. Teams can play bad and be extremely talented. That's why coaches get fired.
Currently one game better than last year.
On the same note do you think their 6' 5" or so WR is a converted basketball player?Quote:
Originally Posted by bluelightstar
Hahah
This has to be a sarcastic thread. Last I checked Fisher finished 8-4.Quote:
Originally Posted by cheewgumm
He lost to Moorhead. Had the same record. And got an LSU defense missing 7 starters when that game ended. I saw nothing special.
A&M is 8 and *******ed 4. With a loss to Mississippi State. Why is Jimbo being ****ing anointed and Moorhead castigated? Also, Jimbo's players are 5-7 at FSU.
Moorhead's being fired?Quote:
Originally Posted by MetEdDawg
I was thinking the same thing, not sure what this post is supposed to mean.Quote:
Originally Posted by MarketingBully
Same record as us, and we beat them. It seems they sucked at learning curves.Quote:
Originally Posted by cheewgumm
We’ve got the most pathetic fans in college football. They’d rather suck Jimbo off than give Moorhead credit for whipping his ass.
Dude you are an insufferable bastard. It must suck to be you. I would hate to hate as much as you do.Quote:
Originally Posted by Saltydog
I know you want us to be bad, but you should take it somewhere else because firing Moorhead after year 1 going 8-4 would do just that. Make us horrible.
It means we should have won more games this year.
Same record is deceiving. What if we played Clemson and they played Kansas st?Quote:
Originally Posted by Cooterpoot
What if we got LSU and KY at home. With LSU missing their D starters? What if A&M played FL? See how that works?Quote:
Originally Posted by msstate7
We seriously need the Enforcer back. There are entirely too many......Confederates......getting free passes to spew their spin here now. This ain't the Pack, enough already.Quote:
Originally Posted by MetEdDawg
What if we beat A&M? Wait. Never mind.Quote:
Originally Posted by msstate7
Don’t mention FL, you’ll trigger his mullen crushQuote:
Originally Posted by Cooterpoot
I like our chances against Clemson right now. I don't like TAM's against Clemson right now. Just sayin.Quote:
Originally Posted by msstate7
I'll second that motion. Anyone that says fire Moorhead needs to be ban hammered. You can underachieve and still have the right man for the job.Quote:
Originally Posted by Liverpooldawg
If we look at this from a financial standpoint we have moorhead costing MSU around 175,000 per win and Jimbo costing the Aggies 980,000 per win. Well I could be off a few thousand. So we kinda come out of this on top. Jimbo is another Les Miles/Cheszick. Ride the coattails of one stud and make your career off of it.
the speed of SEC defenses and was too stubborn to change some of his tendencies. Hopefully he can turn up the heat on the recruiting trail. I think beating a quality opponent in a good bowl game could go a long way in helping with some of the final pieces to this class but that remains to be seen.
So it took him about 6 weeks to change an entire careers worth of developing an offense. I would say that's not that terribly bad.Quote:
Originally Posted by Saltydog
Your mistake was you thought there would be no learning curve. Get over it.
Good post. I think Joe gonna get it going it right direction. He just had a learning curve, just like Dan did. Sucks tho that we just now rounding into form.Quote:
Originally Posted by Saltydog
Thing is tho ... Dan probably would've blown 1 game himself, and our D probably would've blown one too with Grantham. I like Grantham but what Shoop has done exceeds by a good amount what I think Grantham would've done.
Agreed.Quote:
Originally Posted by Liverpooldawg
trollQuote:
Originally Posted by cheewgumm
position. With the type of D we had this year you have to know other programs are noticing.
This thread can't be serious.
The guy finishes with the same record as Moorhead and LOSES to Moorhead and we have fans that want to talk smack about how Jimbo is better than Joe? LOL.
Chewgum is a retard, don’t take it seriouslyQuote:
Originally Posted by Todd4State
Ha, alrighty.
2nd in the West is a good outcome for a first year coach with a new offense to install. That?s all I?ll saying.
Bunch of haters on here...sad.
I think Salty left these off *** I thought it was funny.Quote:
Originally Posted by MetEdDawg
You’re talking about A&M right?Quote:
Originally Posted by cheewgumm
This is the dumbest thread I’ve seen on the board in a while. Next, you should start a thread about Gus Malzhan and say he’s better because they scored 21 on Bama even though they lost to us and lost by 30+ to Bama.
I?m guessing OP did not watch game last night, where 4-5 atrocious officiating calls kept prolonging the game for A&M. The fumbled catch, the 4th down in regulation that was short and not reviews. The pass interference called in the end zone and most of all the targeting. If that?s targeting, we need to go right to flag football next season and save the death by a thousand paper cuts path to pussification we are already well into.
With ~$5B in the bank, and so much more $$ coming in that are having a hard time finding places to spend it, A&M will always "come out on top" when money is the question. They would gladly ante up $1M per win!Quote:
Originally Posted by parabrave
Can you learn to use a computer and stop writing your response in the subject line? It's incompetent and annoying.Quote:
Originally Posted by Saltydog
Jimbo with 8 wins with that roster of loaded players is a good job.
But also look at the mess he left at FSU. So based on that things could go south just as fast.