GOTHOM1!
Printable View
GOTHOM1!
Damn right!!!!!
LOL!!
Hobby Lobby Bitches!!
Right on! GTHOM!
I'm glad OM lost.....but that last TD by Brown looked like a TD to me. I thought he had solid possession of the ball when he fell in the end zone. Had that been us...….I would have gone ballistic.Quote:
Originally Posted by Liverpooldawg
By rule it's incomplete, by common sense it's a catch. Karma catching up a little with the bearsQuote:
Originally Posted by Pit Bull
Lodge and Phillips will be gimpy. 5-0 is a little gimpy. I just hope Abram can stay in the game cause he’s going to bring the pain.
What's the rule that makes it incomplete?Quote:
Originally Posted by Commercecomet24
Yeah they got some guys hurting. I think 5-0 in for a long long night!Quote:
Originally Posted by Cooterpoot
ETA Rawlings hurt too
He didn't survive the ground. If you go to the ground in the process of making a catch you have to control the ball all the way through. AJ didbt maintain control, incomplete pass correct call. I called it as soon as it happenedQuote:
Originally Posted by the_real_MSU_is_us
Some Ole Miss fans were laughing at us getting screwed by the refs last week.
Not so funny now, is it?
Of course it does, to you. I hate the dang rule. But as it stands now that was an incomplete pass. If the Vandy defender had had his feet in bounds it would have been an INT. To me if the ground can't cause a fumble it shouldnt cause an incomplete pass. The rule as it stands now says the ground CAN cause an incomplete pass. Replay got that right as the rule is now.Quote:
Originally Posted by Pit Bull
Exactly. The rule is stupid but that's the way it is. As soon as it happened I said it was incomplete. I've seen this called incomplete a gazillon Times. They got the call right.Quote:
Originally Posted by Liverpooldawg
I think I just saw Kevin Sumlin take a shot of Grey Goose....
Nah, it was more like a bottle.Quote:
Originally Posted by TUSK
It thought it was a int... Unless you can't catch the ball lying on you're back. But I can see the incomplete, because the ball did moveQuote:
Originally Posted by Commercecomet24
Anchor down makes no sense.. You don't want to move on from your level of mediocrity Vandy???
Old Miss is Old Missing again.
I thought so too but they said his feet were out. I couldn't tell from the view they showed where his feet wereQuote:
Originally Posted by BhamDawg205
That's because you're a troll and not a real Mississippi State fan.. A real Mississippi State fan would never admit that AJ caught that ball.. trollQuote:
Originally Posted by Liverpooldawg
Sorry. You deserve it.
Yea didn't see that eitherQuote:
Originally Posted by Commercecomet24
But as the rule is, he didn't catch it. Go home Confederate.Quote:
Originally Posted by mstatefan91
Heckuva play by the Vandy kid though.Quote:
Originally Posted by BhamDawg205
lmao there he is..Quote:
Originally Posted by Liverpooldawg
Also, the fact that you don't get the joke (or maybe you do?) is just icing on the cake
But as the rule is, he didn't catch it. Go home Confederate. Sorry you deserve it, and not just for that post.Quote:
Originally Posted by mstatefan91
I don't like that rule either, but I'm glad the SEC Office replay officials saw fit to enforce it tonight. One other scenario was that it appeared that AJ may have thought that he had possessed the ball and was trying to hold it up kind of like celebrating the catch, while he was on the ground and that caused the ball movement, and thus not securing the catch, until when it was taken away by the Vandy player who had possession, but was apparently out of bounds (never saw that on replay) which made the incomplete pass call. That would really be funny if that was the case.
Really thought he had intercepted the ball. Haven't seen a real good angle where he is definitively out of bounds.. One of the weirdest/hardest replays I've seen this seasonQuote:
Originally Posted by Commercecomet24
You don't even know how to edit bro..Quote:
Originally Posted by Liverpooldawg
Yeah no view they showed where I could see where the defenders feet were. It was an odd play in an odd game.Quote:
Originally Posted by mstatefan91
Couldn't have happened to a better bunch though.. We better stomp their asses up and down the field on ThanksgivingQuote:
Originally Posted by Commercecomet24
Agree completely!Quote:
Originally Posted by mstatefan91
Naw, thought it deserved two replies.Quote:
Originally Posted by mstatefan91
Absolutely. Hard to believe we have supposed "Dawgs" here disputing it,Quote:
Originally Posted by mstatefan91
No you didn't..Quote:
Originally Posted by Liverpooldawg
Anyway, let's stomp OM. Hail State
What's this? Ole Miss complaining about the rules because it didn't go their way? Typical.
Yeah, I’ve seen some post that we have a hand in it as well. All of the State people in the SEC office...really stuff like this couldn’t happen to a better bunchQuote:
Originally Posted by Todd4State
The best one I've seen is that some poor OM soul believes the SEC office gifted this game to Vandy to insure another bowl game between UT/Vandy next week..Quote:
Originally Posted by Really Clark?
Yeah but it’s not just one delusional douche that believes that. I’ve seen several. Bless their heartQuote:
Originally Posted by mstatefan91
ya woo commordore football
I wish we had that kind of clout because we would be Alabama caliber in football.Quote:
Originally Posted by Really Clark?
And typical of them to blame us for everything bad that ever happens to them in football.