In downtown New Albany.
Printable View
In downtown New Albany.
Wish I had known, would have attended.
I wonder if anyone not going to stand when the judge comes in as a freedom of speech.
thought about walking in with my maroon on and asking if they had anything for free.
Should of asked if they were selling copies of Flim Flam too.Quote:
Originally Posted by idog
What a waste of time and money...
Indeed it is....it is also likely to drag out for years. RR is in a fight for their very existence and will go to any length to keep for being disassociated from UM.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ari Gold
Is it possible that the goal of the lawsuit is to JUST get depositions from LL? Do the depositions become part of a legal record if Rebel Rags drops the suit after the depos?Quote:
Originally Posted by Leeshouldveflanked
Make no mistake...this was an OM lawsuit. Rebel Rags is probably having record sales since this started. OM was wanting to get depositions before they went to the COI in hopes that they could trip up Leo and then have something to throw at the committee. Now that that has passed, I'm sure their reasoning is to try and do the same with Leo, but use it when they appeal the sanctions and to let that be their battle cry after the sanctions come down.....WE PROVED LEO LIED AND THAT GOT US PUT ON PROBATION, totally ignoring the rest of their sanctions.
The problem they have is that they aren't going to trip up Leo, and all of this will quietly go away. Shitbirds. Roll Tide
Yep, you could have taken a knee while there!Quote:
Originally Posted by shannondawg
Yancey now tweeting that "Discovery was granted" and Motion to dismiss denied.......says it's about to get real....what an asshole!
Apparel sales are through a 3rd party distributor from which Rebel Rags cannot be disassociated. Disassociation would affect Rebel Rags in no way.Quote:
Originally Posted by Doggie_Style
Judge did say he would revisit the motion to dismiss after hearing discovery.Quote:
Originally Posted by Doggie_Style
Is this judge the ole miss alumnus?Quote:
Originally Posted by MadDawg
It's so wild for me to think about a clothing store suing two college football players for a conspiracy to intentionally harm the business. It sounds ludicrous, and really highlights the lengths they are willing to go to. Not to mention the fact that they only told NCAA investigators. They make it sound like the players were out in front of the store protesting and scaring business off. The whole thing is absurd and they are absurd to think it will save them. But, hey, I guess the have to pin their hopes to something. Just gives Yanax and the rest of the cultish, kkklanish media an opportunity to keep hope alive, and hold on to those subscriptions for a few more months. That's it.
They alternative motives.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dawgs87
I really don't think they have any idea how bad discovery could get for them!! Subpoenas in this situation could make the Nutt lawsuit seem like the least of their worries.Quote:
Originally Posted by MadDawg
Per Ben Garrett Discovery has not yet been granted. Looks like Yanax jumped the gun.
About 99.9% possibility.Quote:
Originally Posted by MedDawg
This!!!Quote:
Originally Posted by Tripp McNeely
Of course, it's why OM had them file itQuote:
Originally Posted by MedDawg
Not a lawyer, but I think that's a very key point. Had they been yelling to the heaveans that they got free stuff on a recruiting visit, it would be a different matter (but if it's true, they could still do that). OM was the one who released the information and the names, and it took them forever to release the content of the violation.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dawgs87
I don't expect the motions to dismiss to be granted prior to discovery. That is rare and only done when the complaint does not state a claim.
I am much more interested in the change of venue. From what little I have seen, I expect that to be granted and the motion to sever the defendants' cases to be granted.
Attorneys know how to drag this crap out for years...Quote:
Originally Posted by parabrave
Please explain this statement. You can PM if you would like. ThanksQuote:
Originally Posted by PassInterference
Disassociation as far as business goes would probably only eliminate their ability to market at UM events or get current UM coaches to any type of marketing or event they would have. It isn't like UM could prevent RR from selling UM merchandise.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mimi's Babies
If anything I bet their business has increased, and would have decreased if this was not made public.
For the simple reason that reb fans would have slacked off buying due to investigations, but have increased buying in support of them.
Basically Rebel Rags doesn't buy merchandise from the school. They buy from apparel companies and licensed wholesalers like Collegiate. The school doesn't own or control those companies. So even if RR is disassociated, there isn't anything the school can do to stop their business.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mimi's Babies
In fact, if the school does dissociate them, then RR can give out even more free stuff to even more croots, and the school can claim they have done all they can to stop him. Which we all know would be BS
Good point. They sued Kobe and Leo and their names hadn't been released. Also, they didn't volunteer tis stuff. The NCAA asked them about it.Quote:
Originally Posted by RocketDawg
Yep, claims it hurt their business. Unless they are false reporting to the IRS, I guarantee their sales have not gone downQuote:
Originally Posted by shannondawg
Quote:
Originally Posted by Interpolation_Dawg_EX
He is an MSU undergrad
This right here is why the case will never go forward. These two anonymous SA were contacted by the NCAA to give honest testimony about the case that they had uncovered through their investigations. LL and KJ did not spread lies to the masses and such and the only way this was made public is through release, non compliantly, by OM to a third party and to the public of their names and the accusations.Quote:
Originally Posted by Spiderman
As far as I know, their names still haven't and never will be officially released.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bucky Dog
They are playing with fire in my opinion. Nothing will come out of this that the NCAA will look fondly on, and State's already got a pass on the players in question. That's been established, yet they're still going forward with it? So why? It's not to win money from a couple of college students. The only reason they could possibly be pursuing this case, at this juncture, is if they're seeking to embarrass the NCAA for letting kids skate. They're trying to turn this into a news story, but the only ones who really care anymore are their own regular mouth pieces.
Oh, and they're hanging onto every thread they can find at this point. The rope is shredded and about to pop. And it's going to be a long fall.
Right on!Quote:
Originally Posted by Political Hack
Nailed it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Political Hack
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bucky Dog
That. And RR is going to have a really hard time proving damages, which is the basis for this case.
Waste of time.
The optics of this situation are bad even if OM got what they want, whatever that is. Discovery works both ways.