but Kelly has more Swagger".
That scares me if I'm Ole Miss.
Thoughts?
Printable View
but Kelly has more Swagger".
That scares me if I'm Ole Miss.
Thoughts?
Love me some swag
Nope, all is well. If I were one of them, it would only scare me if Kelly DIDN'T have more swagger.**
Most important factor in winning games is swag. I would go with Kelly. Natty is gonna be a cake walk for themQuote:
Originally Posted by I seen it dawg
He also says Rod Taylor will be back for Bama, which means they will have 2 first year starters on the O-Line, in Taylor and Patterson, when they go to Bama. So they'll have Taylor at RG, Patterson at LG, a new Center (forgot his name), and a new QB....AT TUSCALOOSA. That could end very badly for the Bears.
Zero reason they shouldn't win every game with all the pieces they have in place.
Ha, he said they will actually "be better on defense". Yea right.
And listen to this..."Bridges and Shepard are so good, it's given them the luxury of putting Hilton at Safety."
I hope they fall flat on their face this year, so I can tweet Parrish all of his idiotic quotes. Bridges and Shepard have yet to play a SEC snap.
Give me Taylor and Patterson vs a'shawn Robinson and Jonathan Allen any day**Quote:
Originally Posted by CadaverDawg
Shepard may have all the talent in the world, but I'll believe that a hearing-impaired individual can be a 100% effective D1 football DB when I see it.Quote:
Originally Posted by CadaverDawg
Kelly has the one thing that will push him to starter status at TSUN...a criminal record. If Buchanan wants to see meaningful snaps he better get to work on that rap sheet. He's two arrests and a trip to Haiti behind the competition.Quote:
Originally Posted by CadaverDawg
Golson and prewitt drove that defense last year. Between them, they had 13 ints, 2 td's, 7 TFL, 10 pass break ups, 77 tackles, and 1/2 sack. No big loss, yeah rightQuote:
Originally Posted by CadaverDawg
This type?Quote:
Originally Posted by thf24
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yWkVa-_sd24
I expect them to be very, very good on defense. I don't know whether they will be better or not, but it wouldn't surprise me if they were.Quote:
Originally Posted by CadaverDawg
He can hear now. There was a recent article somewhere about that.Quote:
Originally Posted by thf24
Hell, Reeco had swagger***Quote:
Originally Posted by CadaverDawg
http://i.imgur.com/28Ss51n.gif
I think I'd prefer actual QB "skills" over QB "swagger". Love to have both, but if forced to choose, it would be an easy decision.
They will be good on D. Their QB play will cost them at least 4 losses
Sounds like the perfect recipe for Kelly throwing lots of INTs this year.Quote:
Originally Posted by CadaverDawg
I agree they will be good on D, but I am slightly amused that they believe there will be no drop off at the two corner spots, due to recruiting stars.Quote:
Originally Posted by Coach34
I mean, would people like us more if Rankin was starting? It would give us more stars in the starting lineup.
I have never seen a greater assumption made that JUCO players, who traditionally take a year to adjust, are going to step in and not miss a beat from last year.
Think about it, between Kelly, Bridges, & Tee, they are heavily relying on 3 JUCO transfers, that have never taken a D1 snap, to step in and be world beaters.
What are the odds that all 3 pan out?
Faith healing can be a great recruiting tool if exploited properlyQuote:
Originally Posted by BeastMan
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g7lR3YDzKCAQuote:
Originally Posted by CadaverDawg
As usual, it is the most wonderful time of the year in Bearland.
No school has been awarded more Championships in February and August than our own beloved brothers from up north. I don't even know we even play the games. It's so unnecessary and gets in the way***Quote:
Originally Posted by thunderclap
'Swagger'. Yeah, that's what we'll call it.
Please, please, please....I so hope Ole Miss starts the less accurate QB because he has more 'swagger'. Especially Chad Kelly's brand of swagger.