Printable View
https://d1baseball.com/columns/2024-...4-projections/
SEC with 11 teams in
State a 2 seed at #9 overall seed Duke
Obviously doesnt mean much right now but we are looked at pretty strongly nationally right now in spite of our own fans whining and moaning
That'd be a great 2/3 matchup for us. Our fans would get an up close look at our next HC. And we could go ahead and interview him that weekend.
That would be a great draw.
Just got to win games. Simple as that.Quote:
Originally Posted by Coach34
Given our talent level, we should be hosting and pushing for a top 8 seed. Being a 2 seed on the road is a pretty big failure from Lemonis. Maybe not as much as the last 2 years, but it shouldn't guarantee him another year.
I don't know about our talent level, but to me just as important (or maybe more important?) than our seed is our position in the SEC. If this is going to be a peak year for us before stepping back some, and we don't finish in the top half of the SEC, that's hard to swallow. I know the SEC is loaded but still, three years without a top half finish is something that appears to have happened twice since the seventies, once with Ron Polk II, then a combination of Polk II's last year and Cohen's first two years.Quote:
Originally Posted by Quaoarsking
Yes, the most rational poster on the board. Have some rep Bruns!Quote:
Originally Posted by BrunswickDawg
You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to BrunswickDawg again.
We are obviously much improved, which is great to see. And with our +19 RD in SEC games so far even with a tough schedule, I think we have a chance to have a very good season. That is awesome.Quote:
Originally Posted by Coach34
However, the only reason we view a regional 2 seed as ?pretty strong? is because of the utter failure of the last 2 years. In reality, that should be a somewhat disappointing season for us, given the 6 SEC teams projected to host. If the best we can do in 3 years is a 2 seed, that would not be a ringing endorsement and reason to keep this staff.
Just playing devils advocate - what if we win the regional as a 2 seed? Do you devalue the '11, '14, '17 and '18 teams because they were a 2 seed?Quote:
Originally Posted by smootness
Being a 2 seed isn't "bad" but it should be a down year, not a high point.Quote:
Originally Posted by BrunswickDawg
Given our level of fan support, we should host 5 times in a decade and be a 2 seed the other 5 times. I could accept an occasional 3 seed if we had some bad luck (and the line between a 3 seed and hosting is pretty small anyway), but we should never miss the tournament at all.
I think a 5 year run should include the following: 1x missed tournament, 1x bounced from a regional, 3 SRs with 1 or 2 Omahas.Quote:
Originally Posted by Quaoarsking
We are top 3 in fan support, top 5 in facilities, top 10 (give or take) in recruiting each year, top 10 in coaching pay, and have to be top 20 in baseball NIL. That should average a strong SR team with occasional peaks or dips thrown in there. Like what C34 was saying in the other thread, SR is a good expectation for our program. Maybe with a slightly >50% chance of making Omaha when we do make a SR
I don?t know? saying you have to make the equivalent of the elite 8 1-2 times every 5 years is TOUGHQuote:
Originally Posted by the_real_MSU_is_us
We should be a top 10-15 team by any weight of the numbers I posted. I am saying in a 5 year stretch I expect: an awful year (missed tournament), a bad year (not field of 16), 1-2 par years (field of 16) and 1-2 years where we punch slightly above our weight and make the elite 8.Quote:
Originally Posted by DEDawg
I don't see how that unreasonable. Like a team can outperform their 5 year average 1 or 2 times in that span
As long as 10-11 teams from the SEC are making a Regional (probably going to be 12-13 starting next year), there's no excuse to ever miss a Regional. I get that baseball is fluky and stuff can happen, but it should be way less often than once every 5 years. Like, once every 20 maybe. In the era of NIL and transfer portal, we should never be "down" for very long.Quote:
Originally Posted by the_real_MSU_is_us
I actually don't get too worked up on what we should expect in the postseason itself. Host half the time and be a 2-seed the other half, and the rest should take care of itself. There's just too much flukiness to get too hung up, as long as we're not underperforming in the postseason regularly.
I don't know, we've been to Omaha 7 times going back to 1997, and that includes the Polk II dark era, the early Cohen rough years, and Lemonis's crash-and-burn.Quote:
Originally Posted by DEDawg
If we're hosting at least twice every 5 years and getting a 2 seed or higher 4 times every 5 years, making Omaha 1-2 times should be doable.
So where are Austin Peay and Central Arkansas projected to be?
Somewhere around where Southern SWAC is projectedQuote:
Originally Posted by CaptainObvious
How’s GA southern? They smoked SC today.Quote:
Originally Posted by Coach34
Southern of the SWAC will probably be playing Jackson of the SWAC for the conference Championship so the winner will be in a Regional. So back to my question, what Regionals will APU and UCA be pencilled in for? They both outstanding baseball teams who beat up on an SEC powerhouse coached by a Hall of Fame College Coach.Quote:
Originally Posted by Coach34
To me the expectations don’t really change from year to year. Be in the discussion to host and more supers than not. Other than that there are so many other variables, but if you are getting to a super 50 percent of the time then 25 percent of the time you would be in Omaha realistically. Now again, there are some years this won’t play out. Coming off two terrible years, I think a #2 seed should be a reasonable expectation but the next year should prove more improvement. Therein lies the problem. I like Lemo. I want him to be the guy to meet our expectations. But my worry is that we won’t be very good next year. Two bad seasons followed by a decent one only to take a step back the next year… will result in a coaching change. And so it should. Lemo needs to get in as a 2 seed and kill it in the portal this off season in order to be our coach in 2026.
Making a Super Regional is our minimum expectation.Quote:
Originally Posted by preachermatt83
I think missed regionals should definitely be rare, but are there 4 programs so bad in the SEC we should never drop into the bottom four? Missouri? UK? It seems like every SEC team takes baseball relatively seriously now and never falling into the bottom three or four is a tall order.Quote:
Originally Posted by Quaoarsking
Delusion, thy name is Todd. Of course you are good for your annual MSU to Omaha predictionQuote:
Originally Posted by Todd4State
We put more emphasis on it than everybody but LSU. I expect Supers with a couple of trips to Omaha. Also expect having a down year where you might be a 2 or 3 seed, possibly miss the regional by a hair.Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnson85
The last 2 years are probably the worst years in MSU History that the head coach wasn't either taking over a dumpster fire (Cohen) or the coach didn't get fired (Polk II).
At least we got a new pitching coach after the worst pitching in a season in MSU history.
Ah the dumbass speaketh.Quote:
Originally Posted by RockyDog
Where is my "annual Omaha prediction" this year? I'd like to see a link on that. Pretty much every time I have predicted that it came to fruition including in 2018 when I caught a lot of heat most of the year because I didn't predict the Cann saga.
Our program standard has and always will be to make a Super Regional at a minimum. I'd like for you to explain to me why that is "delusional" for our program given our success from 2011-2021? It's not like we don't have one of the top programs in the country as far as resources go.
You're probably too busy making idiotic posts about "sports that make money" to notice.
rockydog taking it hard
Yep. If there ever was a troll in threads it is guys like Rockydog don't even care about baseball commenting in a thread about...... baseball.
I may disagree with posters about how to fix things and I criticize coaching and players for reasons that should fe obvious to all, but I, like most here, love our baseball program and have extremely high expectations every year!
I don't know that this is true anymore. Arkansas is right there with us and LSU. UGA is putting $45 million into Foley Field - most in player oriented facilities (locker room, pitching lab, etc.); Florida just spent $65m on their new park that will hold 10,000; Tennessee is putting $95 m into their facilities; A&M is putting $60m into Blue Bell. We have crowds, but don't discount the interest and funding in the rest of the SEC.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tbonewannabe
Great post! I know me and you don't always agree but I love your passion for our baseball program. I believe most of us only want what's best for State. Part of the reason I enjoy this board is because of all the different perspectives you read on here. There are a ton of posts that, if you're open minded enough can make you stop and consider something you've probably never thought about before. Obviously we have some nut jobs too but the vast majority of folks on here are great posters.Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainObvious
You're right. SEC baseball has become an arms race, maybe moreso than in football, based on the competitiveness top to bottom and the talent level.Quote:
Originally Posted by BrunswickDawg