Here it is.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B2s...1EcGhGc1E/view
Printable View
Well, I think y'all can forget about Farrar singing on Freeze.....
"In his time on Coach Freeze’s staff, Coach Freeze never asked
Farrar to break any NCAA rule but always reinforced how important it was that he follow the
rules and maintain the highest standards of conduct. Farrar expresses his hope that this panel will
give Ole Miss and Hugh Freeze every opportunity and consideration in these proceedings. It is
deserved."
Even after being thrown under the bus, he is still trying to protect Freeze. Strange.
Farrar will be a lackey and a flunky to the bitter end. He knows his place.
Like it matters what Barney wants. Freeze is getting his show cause. A ucla assistant got a show cause over a level 2. Big names like tressel, chip Kelly, and Pete Carroll got show causes under old penalty structure... no way in hell does freeze skate
Well if there's anyone we can trust, it's the guy who lied to NCAA investigators over and over and over and over and over in December 2016. Besides the fact that the head coach is responsible for his assistants' actions, Freeze is getting letters of recommendations from people who have a laundry list of allegations in the NOAs their self. That's like going to a prison and picking out the criminals to testify for you as a character witness in a trial.
It doesn't take one long to understand how Barney intends to vindicate himself...Jeez...
"Redacted is the only witness that provided any purported evidence against Coach Farrar.
Redacted is a young man that now plays football for Ole Miss’s rival, redacted .
Redacted likely lured into this witch-hunt by his own head coach so he could escape NCAA charges
himself, deflect his misdeeds onto Farrar and Ole Miss, and keep his eligibility to play for redacted.
A young man who, undeservedly, was given immunity as the NCAA enforcement staff
deliberately turned away from his own admitted violations so that it could pursue the school and
the recruiter it really wanted – Ole Miss and Barney Farrar."
The whole defense of "Mullen did it" is insane, untruthful, and is going to get them slammed. It's hilarious and pathetic at the same time.
Dan Mullen is on the NCAA Oversight Committee. He was added because he's well respected in coaching circles and within the SEC & NCAA. Hugh Freeze is not respected in any of those circles and the defense that a well-respected guy on the oversight committee orchestrated this whole thing shows how screwed they truly are.
Well i think you might be looking at it. Barney held the company line in this response which was submitted on May 23.
Since he was no longer working at UM or with their lawyers, I would there is a strong chance he didn't see UM's response until it came out a couple days ago..
Thus why he felt so mad that he got betrayed as the single problem and all blame on him.
Who knows what he is going to do now... but we now see what he was willing to do.. Sing the company song and go along...
Will that change now? Welll... they ebtter hope they can back the $$$ truck up and quiet him down.
Beardo, I was about to post the same excerpt. Can't believe Farrar is still standing with OM even after they left him out to dry.
Still a clear case of LOIC. All of this happened under Freeze's watch, he had NO IDEA it was happening, and he waited until LAST YEAR to fire Barney?!?! Yep, that's LOICQuote:
Originally Posted by BeardoMSU
The more and more "evidence" they present like this, literally, the stronger case they make for LOIC. If what Barney says is true, Freeze had ZERO control over what his assistants were doing (don't forget the guys named in the first NOA)... that's the definition of Lack of Institutional Control!
Farrar was paid by OM to fall on the sword, and him lawyering up was part of the game. That's it in a nutshell.
Told y'all he did t roll on anyone. None of this matters, tho. What's done is done. The NCAA has what it wants. Nothing by Barney matters now.
This was released by barn and his attny well before he saw the response of OM to the noa.
I'll read it this weekend, but note that this was dated well before OMs response this week. There's a good chance their reapsonse and throwing him under the bus conflicts with what is stated in this letter. Like the case considering his atty's release this week.
It was drafted well before the NOA release. Lol. I still don't think Barn has rolled.
You are correct sir.Quote:
Originally Posted by preachermatt83
May 23, 2017
And, like I said earlier, it doesn't matter anymore. It's all up the COI from here.
As Scooba said, you need to look at the date of his response. It was submitted before Farrar saw the UNM response that threw him under-the-bus.Quote:
Originally Posted by Pollodawg
Right now it looks like he was a good soldier, thinking everyone was on the same page, and they were going to deny and fight this together. In fact, the recent comments from his attorney, Bruse Lloyd, say that.
They were caught by surprise and are pissed about it. To them, it looks like UNM got what they wanted from Farrar, then turned on him.
They may yet pay him enough to shut him up...and that may be the card he is trying to play...but make no mistake...the most recent comments via Lloyd are a shot across the bow at UNM.
Won't there be a NCAA response from the investigative branch to OM's (including Freeze and Farrar) response before it goes to the COI?Quote:
Originally Posted by Pollodawg