Originally Posted by
PSYCHO(thesis)DEFENSE
Rewatched the game last night to put my lingering USM questions to rest, & move on. What I saw:
• After watching the game live I didn’t understand why ppl were down on Rufus Warren. After re-watching, I confirmed those saying he was bad were unfounded. He had no more than 3 negative plays – one of which resulted in a sack, & was very bad. On that play, he didn’t set a good base & payed for it, but that’s something you work on. The rest of the line played fairly well IMO, and Clayborn is the only one I didn’t see have at least 2 negative plays. Knowing Rufus’ career arc, I don’t expect perfection out of a first time LT so I’ll take 2-3 negatives along w/ the positives & washes. Hevesy commented that he didn’t play the full 60 minutes like he’s capable, b/c he’s never played a full 60 minutes, & that comes w/ experience. He also didn’t go to the third level to block as I’d like to see, but that seemed to be scheme-related as he was trying to stay in formation w/ Malone. He had quick feet in pass pro, & when he did get out & run, he showed some speed. Displayed strength at times but needs to work on his punch. No way we’re giving up on Rufus any time soon.
•.