How so? We're recruiting transfer qbs this year. This is one of our biggest targets we have this cycleQuote:
Originally Posted by msu15
Printable View
How so? We're recruiting transfer qbs this year. This is one of our biggest targets we have this cycleQuote:
Originally Posted by msu15
Bryant was 12-2 in his one full year as a starter and led Clemson to the Playoffs. He completed 66% of his passes. We would be extremely fortunate to get him. Ridiculous that people argue this.Quote:
Originally Posted by msstate7
Blake sims led Alabama to the CFB playoff and completed 65% of his passes. When he finally met up with an equal team though, sims was a total liability (3 ints vs Ohio st). Same thing happened last season with KB vs bama where he was abysmal. KB would be a great solution for us if we had a talent advantage over the teams on our schedule... unfortunately, we'll be at a deficit in a bunch of sec gamesQuote:
Originally Posted by HoopsDawg
I would love to have the problem where our QB was outmatched in a playoff game.....Quote:
Originally Posted by msstate7
Me too. That's the problem... we don't have the team to make Bryant look better than he is like ClemsonQuote:
Originally Posted by MetEdDawg
Tua's not available so I will take Bryant and be happy. By the way, Bryant is a pass first guy. Much moreso than Fitz and much more accurate.Quote:
Originally Posted by msstate7
Fine is a better optionQuote:
Originally Posted by HoopsDawg
Anyone here that doesn't want this QB needs to check their sanity.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BbLow9JbSDc
This is the biggest reason I've heard we are ahead of Auburn. Gus wants to run his QB run offense and Bryant wants to be in a pass first offense where he doesn't have to carry the load running the football.Quote:
Originally Posted by HoopsDawg
What about Hurts? He’s won and over 60% completionQuote:
Originally Posted by HoopsDawg
Yeah, I'd rather have McCloud (nfl), Cain (nfl), renfrow, and Higgins (will be in nfl). Let's see how he looks throwing to Jesse Jackson, Guidry, Mitchell, Thomas, etc. The auburn run was very niceQuote:
Originally Posted by Dawg-gone-dawgs
Bryant is officially visiting this weekend. We actually have a shot at him. Incrediblely dumb that some posters on here don't realize that's a good thing. Nothing against KT but he completed 42% of his passes vs SFA. Bryant is an upgrade. He's smart, he's accurate, he can run, he's played in huge games. He doesn't need to clear space on his mantle but he would be a great fit for us and for him. He would also give us another good measure on Moorhead.Quote:
Originally Posted by Really Clark?
He is putting it right in their lap though and HE IS ABLE TO MAKE THE RIGHT READ AND FIND THEM OPEN. I know you got your blinders on because you've already created your stance but geez bro, you can't tell me we wouldn't better with him.Quote:
Originally Posted by msstate7
It's a highlight video, dude. I've watched Bryant play a bunch, and he isn't a difference maker. You could fill a 5-min highlight video of fitz this year to make him look like an AAQuote:
Originally Posted by Dawg-gone-dawgs
Bryant is coming to watch ark. We aren't getting him, and I'm gladQuote:
Originally Posted by HoopsDawg
This kid is a passer, as much as I love Fitz, Bryants mechanics, the way he manipulates the pocket, reading defenses and his touch on the deep ball(and he can run enough)is far ahead of Fitz, and probably anyone we have on the roster at this point. Be a good bridge to Shrader, IMO.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dawg-gone-dawgs
yes that's right, his highlight video...hahahaha Maybe they should post a video of his incompletions and interceptions. smh He is better than what we have period. He can run when needed and he is able to deliver the deep ball, big play with accuracy. That is what Moorhead wants.Quote:
Originally Posted by msstate7
What is all this mechanics, manipulating the pocket, reading defenses, touch on deep ball talk????? I didn't realize there were so many aspects of a QB!!***********Quote:
Originally Posted by Commercecomet24
He threw 13 td passes last season with at least 4 nfl (2 already there and 2 more going) and hunter renfrow. Fitz threw 15 last season with our guys. Fitz is not a passer, and neither is KB. KB threw the ball 112 more times than fitz too... vs acc defenses, and he didn't have to face ClemsonQuote:
Originally Posted by Dawg-gone-dawgs
Rep Given!Quote:
Originally Posted by Dawg-gone-dawgs
Did you not read where he said he has watched KB play a lot? That makes his credibility irrefutable and proves that you're wrong?**********Quote:
Originally Posted by Dawg-gone-dawgs
You can't just go solely on TD passes. The offensive style in general, especially in the red zone dictates alot of that. Now what is a good indicator is completion percentage which I see you conveniently left out because his career completion percentage is 66%! Fitz...54%. Remind me again the percentage Moorhead said he needed to run his offense proficiently?Quote:
Originally Posted by msstate7
That would be 65%, and after running the numbers, I can say with full confidence that 66 is indeed higher than 65.
KB was 60th in the country last season in rating. KB was 70th in yds/att. He's a dink and dunk guy, and we aren't in the same galaxy with Clemson on WR talent. Joe wants a consistent down field passer. We aren't getting him anyway... just remember to apologize next season when ark is beyond pathetic again hitching themselves to himQuote:
Originally Posted by Dawg-gone-dawgs
It's hilarious to me that you think KB can complete the same % to our WRs that he did to the NFL's WR factoryQuote:
Originally Posted by iPat09
Everybody remember what I said about blinders?
You can't present facts here on the board. They always ruin a good stance. - DGD
Quote:
Originally Posted by msstate7
That's not even close to being fair haha. AR has countless other problems to go along with their QB play. Expected since that tiny sample caters to your narrative though.
It is hilarious to me that you think our receivers wouldn't improve with a better QB. They are not as inept as you are making them out to be.Quote:
Originally Posted by msstate7
What are you presenting? Are you saying KB can do the same thing here that he did at Clemson? Do you think the wr talent won't matter? What about the difference in defenses faced?Quote:
Originally Posted by Dawg-gone-dawgs
If we had KB, we'd all-the-sudden produce nfl WRs like ClemsonQuote:
Originally Posted by Dawg-gone-dawgs
A 66% comp 12-2 playoff starter should absolutely like ark out the dumps. No?Quote:
Originally Posted by StateDawg44
Keep in mind that if KB was great he’d go straight to the NFL draft. I’m not saying he wouldn’t be our best qb next year but let’s keep it in perspective
It's funny to me that you all are arguing as to who would be a better QB transfer. As if you all have a say in who it might be. Let's all quit trying to sway the other side and lets talk about recruiting!
Yeah the defense doesn't factor in here at all.Quote:
Originally Posted by msstate7
dude you are something else. You throwing out the straw man arguments aren't you? Did I ever say that we would be producing NFL WR's like Clemson. Have you not ever seen a team that had QB that made the receivers appear better than they were?Quote:
Originally Posted by msstate7
We can win 7-8 games this year with no offense. Surely the great KB can do the same with no defenseQuote:
Originally Posted by StateDawg44
And a team with great WRs can make a bad qb look goodQuote:
Originally Posted by Dawg-gone-dawgs
Missouri leading receiver is a *** 0.8609 TE....NFL guy?
Missouri 2nd leading WR....Johnathon Johnson *** 0.8615. NFL guy?
Do you think Drew Lock would suck at State?
I've made my point (about 10 messages ago haha), so I'll move on. Although I'm not a KB fan, I will be extremely impressed if joe can land him. I think fine is the better option though.
LOL at this shit!