How is it any different???????? How would the most times up with nobody on and 2 outs change? It's the same concept in ****ing coach pitch. Not a difficult thing to mentally graspQuote:
Originally Posted by Coach34
Printable View
How is it any different???????? How would the most times up with nobody on and 2 outs change? It's the same concept in ****ing coach pitch. Not a difficult thing to mentally graspQuote:
Originally Posted by Coach34
This is how you lose a game. Strand 11 runners.
because numbers are different in different levels of baseball. Of all people- numbers is one thing I thought u would understand. Apparently not- you're just dumb as shitQuote:
Originally Posted by Blackout
Holy ****ing shit PLEASE tell me how the 3 hole in college baseball wouldn't come up the most with nobody on and 2 outs... Its a logical concept ****ing not rocket scienceQuote:
Originally Posted by Coach34
Of course numbers are different that doesn't change which spot comes up the most with nobody on and 2 outs because thats THE NATURE OF THE THREE SPOT because of how 1st innings go.. Every other inning is a toss up BUT because of how the 1st works it skews THAT aspect.
Or are you arguing that magically some other spot in the order will magically have more no on, 2 out at-bats.... Calling me dumb, please thats just ****ing retarded you cant grasp this
Must have struck a nerve... Alexander is 3 for his last 28 BTW... That's a cool .107 going back to Nichols state. I like his glove, but he's not andrelton Simmons... We need to try some other playersQuote:
Originally Posted by Dawg4Life
Cody Brown to ShortstopQuote:
Originally Posted by msstate7
nt
Kickers in the NFL don't lead the team in receptions.. Does that mean our kicker should go out for passes?
Centers in the NBA don't take the most 3's.. Does that mean Gavin should have been launching them all year?
The nature of the sport dictates certain things at all levels... Like the 3 hole will always have more nobody on/2 out plate appearances no matter what
He's struggling, no doubt. I just think his asset is with his glove and at least he's putting the ball in play. If Andrelton Simmons is on our team then put him in. I guess my expectations are lower.Quote:
Originally Posted by msstate7
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blackout
sighhhhhh. It's sux arguing with a Tard. You're 1-2 guys are your highest on base guys normally.
I'd like to see a little holland over gridley anyway. it's impossible to be worse l.Quote:
Originally Posted by Saltydog
What the **** does this even mean...Quote:
Originally Posted by Blackout
Someone please ban this nerd..
Thank you to whomever dinged that troll 17.
thsts exactly what I said lolQuote:
Originally Posted by Coach34
LOLQuote:
Originally Posted by mic
Their freshman at bats vs our freshmen... Night and day
I'm not as much upset with Belmont being our SS..Quote:
Originally Posted by Dawg4Life
I'm more pissed off that we haven't had a SEC calibure SS here since Frazier.
I would be willing to bet the LSU back up SS could start for us..
Jim just scared the **** outta me
Which are Robson-Kruger.. Thanks for proving me right. Too many ****ing stupid people here whatever ban me again for showing how you are wrong.. Also (your not you're)Quote:
Originally Posted by Coach34
Belmont had an SEC glove- but right now- he doesn't have an SEC bat