The vibe I'm getting from several of you is, 'These players are receiving benefits from the university for playing. Therefore, they shouldn't have concerns beyond football and should fall in line and do what they're told. And the university president is a man with intelligence and experience, he knows best and shouldn't be questioned. Those in leadership shouldn't be vulnerable to any potential consequences instigated by those they lead.'
Please explain how this viewpoint isn't exactly like that found in communist China or the USSR?

