Printable View
Sure. But those are advanced stats which look beyond the surface and do a great job of seeing what something actually is instead of taking it at surface value. Not all sacks are created equal and those advanced stats tend to do a really good job showcasing that.Quote:
Originally Posted by msstate7
I'd like to see their methodology on how you account for that.Quote:
Originally Posted by CoachT14
And I know I'm being hard on the staff, but we hired the guy running our defense to be HC. That defense has no talent. He was directly involved there, especially at LB. He did fire the DL coach and bring in a great one- Credit there. I like that he brought in Campbell too. Mele on ST looks good. We know Hughes can get us in the recruiting game in MS. McBath is a good coach. His guys have no pass rush in front of them and our better recruits are young. Not a big fan of the OL or TE hires but Fruend does have a lot of ins and I won't say he's bad with the lack of OL talent. Already seeing what Bump can do in recruiting and his WR just broke a receiving record. Not a fan of Brock at all. Got a good behind the scenes group. I don't give two shits one way or the other on Peterson being in the field. It's a MSU move but I just don't care.
so ... the scheme works in not allowing pressure on the QB, and is an equalizer against more talented SEC teams. Who would have thunk it.***Quote:
Originally Posted by msstate7
Add in a mobile QB and some run packages and it was headed in the right direction. Leach had his mobile QB coming in this season as well.
edit: the OC this season had spring and fall to figure out the weaknesses of his offense, and line, and scheme around it.
He was right, being on the field too much is not the same as time of possession. We had too many consecutive 3 and outs. Especially in 3rd quarters.Quote:
Originally Posted by Santiago
With Georgia it's probably more because of new QB.Quote:
Originally Posted by msstate7
Dude, I'm sorry but changing from Monken to Bobo is a drop off. Even if they had the same players back, it would have been a drop off just from scheme and play calling between the two. That's not debatable really.Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackSailsDawg
So moving from 5th ranked offense to the 13th ranked offense with a new QB is a massive drop off to you?Quote:
Originally Posted by Really Clark?
GA has played nobody. They're overrated IMO. Their defense is good but not Natty good like the last few. That offense isn't good. But that schedule is so easy. Maybe it picks up later in the year with the SEC so down.Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackSailsDawg
Can't argue with that really. Just hope Barbay isn't our Bobo.Quote:
Originally Posted by Really Clark?
As of now ... who do you think is a Natty type team?Quote:
Originally Posted by Cooterpoot
Ohio State barely squeaked by ND. And ND is always overrated.
FSU same with Clemson. Clemson hasn't been the same since they lost their good coordinators.
I'm betting on Kirby until it's proven otherwise. Cause as long as Kirby is at UGA, their D will be very good IMO.
With their cupcake schedule so far? YesQuote:
Originally Posted by BlackSailsDawg
BS.Quote:
Originally Posted by Coach34
Did I say massive? I don't think so but why don't we finish the season after they have played some better opponents also. UTM - FCS, Ball St 118th scoring Def, UAB 123rd scoring Def, So Car 84th scoring Def. That's not exactly playing against elite defenses.Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackSailsDawg
Me tooQuote:
Originally Posted by dawgday166
There are no dominate teams at this point. There's a whole lot of parity and good teams. The SEC isn't down if you actually watch other conferences play. Yeah it may be a little off normal sec years but the whole country is really playing some mediocre football right now.Quote:
Originally Posted by dawgday166
The reason you didn't is because it's not. However MS7 (which is the conversation you entered) said they do have a massive drop off. The Drop off they have right now is due to replacing a seasoned QB and some skill positions.Quote:
Originally Posted by Really Clark?
Our OC has done a piss poor job installing this offense. Our OL in an 11 or 12 is confused and it's hurting our chances of winning. We are about to enter the meat of our schedule and are 4 games into the season. We are running 11 personnel 74% of the time.
Agreed. A lot of people thought FSU was elite then the last 2 weeks against BC and Clemson showed they are good not elite. Really think it's wide open this year and it will just be who's hot at the end. USC or Oregon could sneak in. Does Texas have enough for a run? Was ND just OSU's turd game they seem to have every year? A lot of questions this year.Quote:
Originally Posted by Commercecomet24
If Bobo was the OC last year they are not 5th in scoring and they don't win that OSU playoff game. He is a drop off by himself. Just with his scheme, play calling, nature, tendencies his offense is easier to defend than Monken. They still may end up a Top 30 type offense, good but not great and a drop off. We will see if it picks up later in the year but it's not a buy right now.Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackSailsDawg
IMO it actually makes the year more fun and exciting because it really is kinda wide open and a surprise team may wind up winning it all(which probably won't happen), but still it makes it more interesting to me because I think at this point its an "Any Given Saturday" type year.Quote:
Originally Posted by Really Clark?