Not to mention Abeline Christian. I'm sure he'll run it up on them. I would too if my offense looked like his does right now honestly. I bet we end up around 28 PPG or so like last year +/- 3 PPG
Printable View
Sweet jesus.Quote:
hey our passing yards is up 18 yards per game!!
No.. That's false. \
2017- 158 Per game
2018- 151 per game.
2019- 191 Per game.
That's 40 yards per game with injuries to that position.
https://www.teamrankings.com/college...ate=2019-10-24
2019--- 371.3Quote:
We are 26 yards per game less this season
2018--- 379
And that's mainly with a Frshman QB.
Fell free to double check that.
Considering he gave them Monday off....
https://www.wbrc.com/2019/09/16/coac...like-days-off/
A tradition for the Sabans to bring Alabama's freshman football players to Lake Tuscaloosa. Saban delights in whipping his boat around the lake, attempting to flip the players off the inner tube that drags behind. "We have guys who have never been in the water, and we have guys who have been tubing since they were 8 years old," Saban says. "There is strategy involved."
You don't know that he would not have.. and no, he didn't get creamed due to a shitty clock in his head. Missed blocks by the OL and RB that Moorhead did not recruit.
Either he was 70+% before injury or not. Which is it? I already know.... but let's see you be honest for once. 20/30 in game 1. 9/10 before coming out for game 2 due to being injured. that's 72.5%. YOu have zero IDEA what would or could have been. Neither do I. However, I do know what happened after the fact. Some thing you and the collective like to avoid.
But you do you.
Moorhead is here. Not going anywhere. Have a nice night.
I don't NEED to dodge and deflect. That's on you.
- Was he hired to put in his offense? YEP! had he not, you and the rest of the collective would have bitched then too. Just like 2017.... 2016... 2015...etc.
- Either the guy he recruited was 72.5% or not before injury. Is that true or not? Its a yes or no. That's a hell of an improvement.
- In fact, Moorhead is recruiting in ways Mullen could not. Cross. Mullen walked away from. Shrader... Moorhead. Witherspoon... Moorhead. Marks... Moorhead. etc etc etc etc..
We averaged 173.8 passing yards per game in 2018 and 191.9 this season. 397.4 total yards last season and 371 this year.
http://www.cfbstats.com/2018/leader/...02/sort01.html
http://www.cfbstats.com/2019/leader/...10/sort01.html
https://static.hailstate.com/customp...9/teamcume.htm
https://static.hailstate.com/customp...8/teamcume.htm
Anybody can make mistakes but I usually have already doubled check when I put a stat out there.
So again, we have gained a whopping 18 yards passing which is good for 13th in the league (against weaker passing defenses this season), 13th just like last year. But because our rushing is down, we are a negative 26 yards per game from last season. Yards are down, points are down 3.6 per game from last year and 7.1 from 2017.
I get what you are saying but to compare Saban taking the team (does he bring the whole team?) to your lakehouse for the weekend and MSU taking them to Geyser Falls or wherever they went is quite the stretch. Even more so when Saban is using it as a strategic growing experience and team bonding.
Get real if you think his lake trip and geyser falls had the same effect on each teams players. You know it doesn't. Don't even try to pretend on this one.
So you ignored the other two parts of the post so I?ll mark it down as a W and now your whole argument is that we?re in a rebuild year.
News flash. There is no time to have ?rebuild? years in the SEC West. That?s how you end up like Arkansas which is the trajectory we have now. This team has too many talented players to be in a rebuild and you don?t build your offense for the future by running seniors at WR when by your own admission the ones we have are a recruiting gap.
It?s not hard to switch from 11 personnel to 12 personnel with his route concepts. The receiver that shifts in to a TE just runs the route the receiver was supposed to on pass plays. Sure some plays you can?t run at that point because it takes away the influence of the routes on some zones, but it opens up a plethora of running plays and some new pass routes. The same could be said of 13 personnel. I?m not faulting him for not going 21 as msu has hardly ever ran 2 backs in the past few years and those concepts change a whole lot more.
The point is, he needs to adjust and adapt. If he can?t adjust and adapt pregame to his own teams needs, what gives you the confidence that he could ever be a good coach making adjustments at halftime? Since you like stats so much what do you have to say about our teams poor 1st AND 3rd Q?s? To me that shows an absolute lack of preparedness on the coach.
And you?re off your rocker trying to tell people he?s not on the hot seat. He has the HOTTEST seat in America.
It?s one thing to come in and follow the greatest coach at this school?s footsteps and be slightly worse doing the same things he did. It?s another to come in and rip up what he did completely but still tread water. It?s a total other horrible disgraceful thing to rip up the foundation and replace it with way worse discipline and performance.
You also keep blaming Mullen for the kid?s who got suspended. Tell me where that happened under Mullen? Why didn?t these guys who are upperclassmen involved in it have it happen before? Why was it during Moorhead?s first season? Maybe just maybe it?s a new lack of discipline.
We were told that Penn State's comeback wins were due to Joe's in-game or halftime adjustments on offense. Anyone really believe that now? I see a complete lack of innovation or understanding of what the other team is doing to stop you! I think it's safe to say now that Franklin kept a leash on Joe. A lot of Penn State's success for two years was more of Franklin being a good head coach than Moorhead being a good OC.
Helps when you have play makers that can make explosive plays fairly regularly. We don't have a single guy on the offensive side of the ball that I would deem " explosive". None of our WRs could beat Phil Fulmer in a foot race and thats a problem.
The cupboard on offense was left pretty depleted when Mullen departed.
Mullen would definitely be doing a lot better than what we are seeing but he wouldn't have any explosive guys either he would just be better at utilizing what he does have. I really wouldn't consider Hill explosive. He's a really solid back for us but I wouldn't say he is elite at anything, just above average at a lot of things.