They're taking too long to decide if targeting
Printable View
They're taking too long to decide if targeting
Marks just gets killed every game. Rogers could have easily run for that first down.
not sure why this is taking so long.
His head snapped back pretty hard on that "non-targeting".Quote:
Originally Posted by ShotgunDawg
What a BS call. Regardless, it was a hit on a defenseless receiver.
Typical bullshit call for Auburn.
What? WTF?/
Wow, if not targeting it should at least be unnecessery roughness.
Not gonna lie. Marks has taken some hits this year.
Seems like every time I see a big hit on one of our players it always seems to be Marks.
Props to him.
Birmingham review took care of that penalty.
What in the holy hell just happened?
They had to call Sankey.Quote:
Originally Posted by HoopsDawg
Well we can't say the 3/8 is what is gonna get us. They have done it all so far in defense.
Why is Leach not bitching out a ref? I can't stand coaches who just bend over on horrible calls
They seem to really be keying on him. Did he talk trash on Twitter or pre-game?Quote:
Originally Posted by vv83
That was absolutely head hunting on the bullshit no-targeting reversal.
that back judge should have called it a personal foul, late hit. Then they could have reviewed for targeting. By calling it targeting, they couldn't assess a penalty.Quote:
Originally Posted by magrooder
It's only targeting or not. Head or neck area of a defenseless receiverQuote:
Originally Posted by HoopsDawg
I thought hitting a defenseless player like that after the ball is gone was a personal foul with or without targeting?
What is the world did they see?
Yeah, you've got to stand up for your players on plays like that.Quote:
Originally Posted by vv83