You would be very incorrect here.
Printable View
No DA you got negative rep for once again pulling your usual Liverpool roundabout way of calling me and others a non-MSU fan. And for the seven billionth time I never banned you from the poli board dude. You went on an anti-muslim crusade in a thread you started and another mod banned you for it. Do you have memory loss problems?
I haven't seen you in one of my threads there lately. Bring it over there if you want to get into that again. This isn't the correct board for it.
I know who got me banned that time. I don't and never did blame the guy who actually pulled the plug on me. I never had any reason to. I don't stand on technicalities.
I am happy to say that I did, and I'll welcome the opportunity to have you call me a liar to my face. [ETA: Calculus-based, physics major courses, no notes or examples stored in my calculator or anywhere else but my mind, Physics 1-3, astronomy, astrophysics, nuclear, modern, thermo, electronics, etc.]
I think a couple of people doth protest too much in defense of academic dishonesty. Also, we learned about "projection" in Carskadon's class.
Hail State!
Juxtapose Nick’s situation here vs. North Carolina faking an entire college within the University in order to keep their hoops team eligible throughout their careers.
No building, no professors in existence, faked the whole damn thing. So after nearly a decade of investigating this thing the NCAA says “welp, this is not an athletics issue and out of our purview.”
I don’t believe we should lower our standards to that but it really is a sad commentary on our society.
Good call. The only reason on earth someone would try to put practicing on old tests to find representative questions and storing a digital cheat cheat on their calculator is feeling a little guilty about the second.
Lots of people pass hard college classes without cheating. Saying ‘everyone does it (or at least half do)’ or ‘it is not that different than what X or Y did’ is just rationalization.
And, come on, if the story about someone else taking Nicks test is true, a credible university cannot let that slide.
I remember who I had in Physics 2. It was someone who wasn't a professor and didn't have a PhD. He was likely by far the easiest Physics professor the University ever had. Everyone in our class wanted him for Physics 3, but I don't think he taught again. His name was Jack Nail. I would have run through a wall to have him in Physics 3, but it wasn't my luck. Instead I had Ferguson for Physics 3.
I made an A in Physics 2 and didn't cheat. There were many others in my class that did as well. Like I said, he was very easy.
The sad narrative on this thread is those who think cheating is okay in order to obtain something, because "everybody does it". They want the easy way to take something they don't deserve. They don't want to put in the work to earn what they get. It's an entitlement culture.
I still don't know what is wrong with giving a donation to get your kid into a school you want. Admissions are in a grey area anyway. They can choose who to admit. There is not a clear cut minimum threshold for people. Hell Harvard or Penn State can admit someone that has a 16 on the ACT if they want.
I don't think there's anything wrong with it legally but you're taking a spot away from a potentially more qualified kid who probably worked harder but just doesn't come from a rich family. America shouldn't be about whose the richest parents being able to make their kids successful with their money. It should be about the most talented and hardest working kids making themselves successful on their own.
So nothing concrete on Nick? Just some more of the “well I heard this and it’s concrete BUT I can’t say??”