Oklahoma as well.Quote:
Originally Posted by Todd4State
Printable View
Oklahoma as well.Quote:
Originally Posted by Todd4State
Quote:
Originally Posted by bulldawg28
Max out the NIL credit card. Whatever it takes $ wise.
What is our current 2 deep at WR by position. X-slot-ZQuote:
Originally Posted by StarkVegasSteve
Everyone knows we need at least 2-3 legit dlinemen but I'm starting to get worried about C. Apparently we've already missed on 4 potential Centers to SMU, Arkansas, Kansas and UVA.
Isn't the UAB Center still available? Maybe we get the kentucky Center
The Kentucky C is Brandon Walker?s cousin fwiw. Hopefully we can land him
He's just depth though, not a starting guy like you'd prefer. Could be down the road.Quote:
Originally Posted by Chuck3124
I am not in that room with Bumphis so I don't know how he sees it. My best guess AS OF THIS MOMENT:Quote:
Originally Posted by HoopsDawg
X: Mosely, Ricky Johson/Sanfrisco Magee
Slot: Brenan Thompson, ?
Z: Jaron Glover, Johnson/Magee
We also had 4 HS WR commits so we have to pull from. I think we're going to have a clearer picture of the WR room after the dead period. I do still believe we take 2-3 more WRs. That board is just guarded far more than any other position. If I have names I'll give them to y'all. Offense is the one thing I'm not really worried about. Because push comes to shove, we have the spring portal, and it will be far more active this year than it's ever been.
Also, it looks like we are the favorite to land Fluff Bothwell. This will probably cause another back to jump in the portal. I don't know if it would be Daniels or Davis, but I think it's one of them.
I love that name.Quote:
Originally Posted by StarkVegasSteve
Hopefully he is the next Scattebo!Quote:
Originally Posted by StarkVegasSteve
I'm not worrying about WR yet but man, it's been rough so far & OL misses have been a little concerning. I'd overpay for Bothwell and not blink. DL and edge is ugly so not sure what we do there. I'm assuming the Texas guys and maybe Umass but I'm scared to watch
This is why I don't think we should turn Kelly A away if he wanted to come back pending all this legal stuffQuote:
Originally Posted by StarkVegasSteve
We wouldn't turn him away. But again, Pavia just has an injunction. There still has to be a case, and it's just for Pavia right now. I imagine there's guys that are going to wait to see what the case ends up as before they make a move. We are waiting for that as well. Booth will not be back though. He is ready to go to the NFL.Quote:
Originally Posted by msu15
I know its been discussed, but I'm worried about the OL too. I guess how Pounders played has me spooked. I don't mind the James Madison OL for depth, but counting on him to make the jump to SEC has me worried.
I really like where we are at LB, QB and Safety and that is about it.
WVU WR Hudson Clement has entered the portal
51 catches for 741 yds and 5TDs
This is why I'm not worrying about WRs. There's plenty receivers entering the portal daily and more will enter this weekend.Quote:
Originally Posted by BigDawg81
Any idea who Steve?s tweet is about?
hopefully it?s the Texas DTQuote:
Originally Posted by Chuck3124
Who is about to commit? All the beat guys have their weird little memes going for us.
Texas DTQuote:
Originally Posted by Chuck3124
Good get or extra body?Quote:
Originally Posted by StarkVegasSteve
High ceiling and not too low a floor. He can definitely play at this level though. Not a Wilky Denaud situation.Quote:
Originally Posted by TrapGame
We're not signing "extra bodies" it's a competition to start. EVERY scholarship player is signed with the belief they have the ability to start. No university signs half their signees as being stated to be depth pieces. Either you can play or you can't. If they feel you can't you become walkons.Quote:
Originally Posted by TrapGame
Sydir Mitchell to LSU
Mitchell was a big boy - no idea if he can play but would have been a nice DT prospect. I'm not going to say we're doing terribly, but a review of other SEC portal commits makes me a little less excited where we stand. We're getting better but just feels like we're not closing the gap as much as I'd like - at least on paper.
I have to agree. We are missing on a bunch of players. I'm trying to be patient.Quote:
Originally Posted by Irondawg
Okay, that makes more sense.Quote:
Originally Posted by bulldawg28
How did Indiana lead the country in rush defense, I know they don't have big time recruits and they play in a great conference. We need to see what they're doing
Look at their schedule. That should answer your question.Quote:
Originally Posted by msstate7
Ehhh... we couldn't stop the scrubs on our schedule, so I won't criticize them. Sure they didn't play a great schedule, but being #1 in rush defense still says a lot. We need to see what they do bc I know it isn't who they haveQuote:
Originally Posted by StarkVegasSteve
lol, I apologize to any Indiana fans hereQuote:
Originally Posted by msstate7
It always blows my mind how people can't grasp the difference in the competitive balance of schedules.Quote:
Originally Posted by StarkVegasSteve
98 yd house call. We already do what they do.Quote:
Originally Posted by msstate7
If it was truly the BEST 12 teams, it would be 6 SEC teams, 3 Big 10 teams, Arizona State, Notre Dame, and someone out of Clemson/Miami/Colorado/Indiana/SMU.Quote:
Originally Posted by HoopsDawg
The other 3 conferences would never accept that.Sankey screwed up ever accepting this format though.
You could convince me that AT PRESENT MOMENT, Florida could beat 4-6 of the playoff teams. They went 7-5.
If we played their schedule, do you think we woulda led the country in rush defense? No one is saying they played a great schedule, but they aren't good... that's the point - they aren't good, but they were good stopping the run. We should see how. I wanna emulate that schemeQuote:
Originally Posted by HoopsDawg
It blows my mind you cant realize those scrubs we are saying IU stopped are the same quality of Toledo. Its a pretty fair questionQuote:
Originally Posted by HoopsDawg
What kind of question is that? Of course not. We were horrible.Quote:
Originally Posted by msstate7
Quote:
Originally Posted by StarkVegasSteve
We could have possibly 5 or 6 on that schedule.Quote:
Originally Posted by StarkVegasSteve
We would have probably won 5 games with their schedule. FIU,WIU,Charlotte, and Purdue. That is 4 right there. I also feel pretty confident we could beat a team QB’d by Mike Wright, he was still starting when Indiana played Northwestern. And honestly between Michigan St, UCLA, Maryland, and Washington, we probably could have found one more win.Quote:
Originally Posted by HoopsDawg