I agree with that. I also don't want to give up on this season yet, which is what letting Arnett coach the last 2 games is doing.
Printable View
So the sun sets on a day where other real programs did real work and we sat with our thumbs up our ass. Bout right.
It's awfully convenient that this "rumor" doesn't come out until today, isn't it? People have been talking about firing him for weeks, seriously discussing it since at least the Kentucky game, and it's not until today, after Keenum and Selmon stab the fanbase in the back in a brutal betrayal, that the pro-Arnett crowd (people who want him to remain our coach, but know they can't explicitly say so after last night's debacle) starts spinning this "oh yeah, well acksually his buyout is not what has been said all along, it's this different thing. So don't worry. We'll just fire him later when we can winkwink"
You think he beat Alabama? Because OM is that much better than us. I don't care who coaches. We aren't beating OM.
It's a 17ing excuse that's pointless. We aren't magically going to the Leach Air Raid so Will can play dump off all night. We aren't likely going to have our RB I playing. We aren't getting back the best defensive players from last year to help out this disgustingly pathetic example of a defense. Even our punter sucks.
No- not at all. It makes me think we want our next HC to think we dont overreact and do shitty things to our coaches. Contrary to what you think- firing Arnett after 1 season while transitioning from the AR will rub some guys in the business the wrong way. We are going to do it- but it will turn off some guys.
Yes because coaches have no idea what its like to start your 2nd and 3rd team QB's for 4-5 games after losing your starter. Those coaches know how easy it is to plug guys in just like fans do on playstation
While you guys give this staff no quarter after losing Rogers coaches understand that shit hurts your program and causes problems