And probably crowd out all other forms....if it doesn't mutate again. Hopefully in a month this wave starts receding with (relative to Delta) low deaths, and we can all move on from Covid.
Printable View
Do they at the same rate though? And doesn't that matter?
I don't just mean a vaccinated positive with a breakthrough infection vs. an unvaccinated positive (though that's a question worth asking itself), but also taking into account that a vaccinated person is much less likely to have it to be able to spread in the first place.
This entire thread proves we are an unserious, nihilistic lazy nation.
No he's not. Myocarditis is also a side effect of COVID, and mathematically that makes him more at risk of it as an unvaxxed than as a vaxxed.
It's like the regular flu shot an guillan-barre syndrome. Technically you can get it from the vaccine (like 1 in a million), but you're more likely to get it by going unvaxxed and getting it from the flu (much more common than that).
Remember, it's always Numbers Over Ancedotes, every time. Facts matter. Math wins out in the end.
Something is very weird and suspect about those numbers. Either the tests are bad (could it be sabotage?), or there are a lot more players lying about their vaccine status.
If breakthrough infections were really this common, it would be showing up in a lot more cases than just the NFL.
I certainly can't vouch for the vac numbers. Just going by what is said... but the positives just this week are crazy. And the ones who have recently tested positive lately aren't included. The rate is through the roof and almost none are sick..... but the asymptomatic aren't being tested outside of sports... and why should they?? Again, stupid