Except these days there is Zero way to predict the win loss record for any team. I tend to agree on your prediction, but we could go 9-3 because half those teams could suck!!!
Printable View
100%. The real shot callers.
Edited to say this is toward CourseSuper referencing the boosters. Thought I quoted him.
Big issue after Leach death, yes, but I still put the blame on Keenum. When you're the freaking PRESIDENT of the entire university you need to have the brass balls to make the hard decisions. Imagine if we took our lump in 2023 (which ended up being a terrible season anyway) instead of putting the rebuild off an entire year.
We've got to start 3-1 at a minimum (and really need to be 4-0) if we want any real shot at a winning record.
Granted, you never know in the portal/NIL era, but in all likelihood games 5 through 8 are losses, while games 9 through 11 seem like opportunities to pick up a win. But you know Vanderbilt and Auburn fans are counting us as a win. (And Missouri, South Carolina, and Minnesota fans probably are too.)
Right now, I think we probably pick up an early road win to get excited, play Missouri hard but lose close, don't get totally embarrassed in October, finish 4-8 or 5-7, and have all of the same arguments all over again ("we're improved!" and "we didn't pay for good enough talent!" and "the schedule was hard!" vs. "Now he's 4-24 against p4 teams!").
Disagree, we were on the downswing at that point. It might be slow improvement, but we're on an upswing to where we were 3 years ago. There's hope in some young talent and flashes with a young head coach. We need to improve no doubt, but to act like we're at an all time low is crazy.
It looks like we're raising our floor with what we've brought in. We need a good LT, Edge, and OF skill player to raise our ceiling.
*
As bad as we have been the last 3 years, it is still not Croom level bad. It wasn’t even just Croom himself but the 3 years before him were awful too. 2001-2008 was just an awful stretch of Miss State football until we hired Byrne and Mullen.
He's straddling the 2 theories. He knows he needs experience and is bringing some in(looking at more). But he also knows the importance of building. It's like KT at the beginning of this season. He was not going to start but we knew he would be our guy. These talented young people are starters for 2027 and rotation this year. It will be the first year at an opportunity to be really deep.
He?s not straddling any theories, he?s improving the roster at every available scholarship regardless of eligibility. This is why we?ve had 50+ new players for consecutive years, because we?ve got to elevate the bottom of the roster while at the same time making investments into immediate difference makers. Essentially he?s signing 4 classes in 2 years because of how bad of shape the roster was.