Baseball Recruiting

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by StarkVegasSteve

If Hines had any sort of leverage I would say he comes back 100%. I just don't know how much he'd realistically raise his stock by coming back. I mean maybe if he put up Rooker type numbers then yes.

---

If he's past the 10th round he'll probably make more money in the long run with NIL + senior sign bonus than a 125K signing bonus.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Coach34

This is where I hate they changed the damn draft rule. Under the old rules? Jordan and Dirtbag are back for a 3rd year- which they both need. Instead they are draft eligible. I don’t think Dirtbag will go high enough this summer but you never know

---

Unless a scout falls in love with Mershon I think he comes back. He'll still have leverage.

[QUOTE=Todd4State;1605409]If he's past the 10th round he'll probably make more money in the long run with NIL + senior sign bonus than a 125K signing bonus.[/QUOTE

We'll see. He's kind of like Kellum. If he comes back, then fine. But don't continue to play him if he struggles next year. Hujsak should've been playing last year but we were too loyal to Clark because he hit a HR one time in Omaha.

[QUOTE=StarkVegasSteve;1605412]

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Todd4State

If he's past the 10th round he'll probably make more money in the long run with NIL + senior sign bonus than a 125K signing bonus.[/QUOTE

We'll see. He's kind of like Kellum. If he comes back, then fine. But don't continue to play him if he struggles next year. Hujsak should've been playing last year but we were too loyal to Clark because he hit a HR one time in Omaha.

---

Clark hit .299 last year with a .939 OPS. Hancock is the name you should be thinking of

[QUOTE=the_real_MSU_is_us;1605420]

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by StarkVegasSteve

Clark hit .299 last year with a .939 OPS. Hancock is the name you should be thinking of

---

^^^THIS^^^