Except it's not politicians. It's the people who bought them. They're just puppets.Quote:
Originally Posted by William Tecumsah Sherman
Printable View
Except it's not politicians. It's the people who bought them. They're just puppets.Quote:
Originally Posted by William Tecumsah Sherman
Yep... goats are free game, right. Just like the old days... Lube or no?Quote:
Originally Posted by Coach34
You're a piece of sh!t.Quote:
Originally Posted by paco
Fascinating, I knew us libertarians (be responsible with money federally, but live and let live personally) were rare, but it's crazy how rare. I feel it's the only ideology that is sustainable and lets everyone be happy. Cramming down rules on others means the Gov't has a lot of power, which means as soon as the "other" side wins you're now being forced to live a lifestyle you don't want. OR, we lift the Feds powers to oppress us and live however you want.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rex54
The graph shows 4 other interesting things to me: 1) Liberals truly are extremists in their views, 2) Liberals don't have diversity of thought, 3) R's don't really have a cohesive economic view. And 4), look at the left-right axis ends. +.5 (conservative economically) seems to have literally 1/50th the support -.5 (liberal) policies get. Wonder if that's the graph makers not defining true moderate correctly, or indicative of Americans saying "national debt? Never heard of her".
I think R's freaked out about Obama spending saying it would cause inflation and national debt would cripple us, then when it didn't do either many Americans -falsely, in my opinion- got the impression that no about of spending or debt was a problem.
So they are responding to so called discrimination by discriminating haha
State will host. I would bet on it. Money is the root of all evil
Libertarianism is the most ridiculous ideology to ever be conceived. It's literally the avenue for middle-tier-IQ people to think they are wise. Guess what - there will always be a state. There will always be a sovereign. The goal is to be that sovereign to fulfill your vision of civilization. "Libertarianism" is fundamentally a childish whim, a complete fantasy.Quote:
Originally Posted by the_real_MSU_is_us
I'm not an expert on NCAA rules but I dont think goats are allowed to compete. But if they are- the ones with a penis plays with the boys and the one with a ****** play with the girls.Quote:
Originally Posted by Turfdawg67
It's funny how it's all one-sided isnt it? You dont see anybody born with a ****** trying to play SEC football (not counting Vandy's publicity stunt)? No LB'ers or RB's? No trans in SEC baseball? Wonder why that is.......
Let?s make lemonade.
Tell our men?s basketball to declare as women. Then let?s kick the holy hell out of all the girls teams.
The end.
Also this has nothing to do with transgender issues.
This is Maoist takeover of America with willing liberal idiots playing along.
People look at entire states but counties and towns are the real split. Cook County is nothing like rest of Illinois. St Louis City is nothing like the rest of Missouri. In Texas you have Travis County that is deeply liberal.Quote:
Originally Posted by Quaoarsking
The other split is non geographical, the kids are way more left than the parents. Even people that are left today will be considered reactionary in 8 to 12 years. Plus you have a projected 43% hispanic nation by 2050. That may cancel out all the white/black stuff. Small towns will probably look similar in 2050 but the major cities will be totally different.
This world has turned into a B movie.
Yep. Ritual humiliation is a tactic - the trans stuff is on a society wide scale but it's no different than the Chinese students doing the dunce cap routine.Quote:
Originally Posted by cheewgumm
https://allthatsinteresting.com/word...le-session.jpg
Even in Cook County, Trump got over 500,000 votes (24%), and Trump got around 40% in the suburban counties surrounding Chicago. There's just never going to be a way to partition the country into two.Quote:
Originally Posted by The Federalist Engineer
I was going to ask, as the thread starter, if we can stop the political talk and get back on the subject of how this impacts our baseball team..but this IS a political discussion.
The NCAA made it this way.
Red or blue, the NCAA has made it clear they will alter the course of college sports based on their political beliefs. Is this right or wrong? Personally I think this is wrong. We separate church and state. Shouldn't politics and sports be the same way?
We can all unite on one front however... GTHOM
This is where the future political boundaries will revolve around. Not red/blue.Quote:
Originally Posted by The Federalist Engineer
Not with that attitude!Quote:
Originally Posted by Quaoarsking
Why does it have to just be two?
As long as the NCAA is going to insist on this shit, we should embrace it and build a super transgender team to kick the crap out of everybody else is women?s teams. In every sport.
I am all for equal rights for everyone. The sooner Mississippi gets on board, the better.
Now with that being said, I also fully support a level competition field of play. Men, that identify as women have an advantage over Cis women. Which I do not agree with at all. Point blank.
Well, the first thing wrong is clearly your math... Outside of that, not sure...Quote:
Originally Posted by Extendedcab
Lol he said "cis" and was completely serious in its usage. How pathetic.Quote:
Originally Posted by Lord McBuckethead
Yes. I agree. Can we get like our entire TE squad to play women's basketball and our baseball Waltons play softball?
You can be the asshole that uses the incorrect terminology. Bet you still say tatty dawgs.
The fact is the NCAA want this to happen. So why are we fighting it? Who cares if you personally don?t believe in it? That doesn?t matter.
I personally don?t believe in a lot of shit but does anybody care? No.
You think the Lord is not concerned with the this transgender filth? Wow.Quote:
Originally Posted by Turfdawg67
Invoking? Lol. You don?t quite understand the concept of prayer do you?Quote:
Originally Posted by Turfdawg67
We need to be absurd to illustrate the absurdity.
Cohen does not have the guts ( despite his reputation, he?s mostly been shown to be a low rent AD with little conviction), but it should be done.
Some team should load up on transgenders and dominate women?s sports.
I wish we would do it, but we won?t.
PatheticQuote:
Originally Posted by Lord McBuckethead
From your mouth to Gods ear my dear brother! #letItBeJesusQuote:
Originally Posted by Todd4State
Follow the science....except for XX versus XY
Oh but it would! Big time. Wherever Texas goes, the winner shall beQuote:
Originally Posted by BeardoMSU
Lets put it down in simple terms.... the ncaa does not have the authority to do this. Period.
Way to show your patriotism, Preach.Quote:
Originally Posted by preachermatt83
Yes sir, you are. Grow up.
Well said friendQuote:
Originally Posted by 99jc
PREACH!!!!Quote:
Originally Posted by Coach34
OutstandingQuote:
Originally Posted by Coach34
Haven't we been over this before?Quote:
Originally Posted by William Tecumsah Sherman
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XY_sex..._system#Humans
Quote:
Humans, as well as some other organisms, can have a rare chromosomal arrangement that is contrary to their phenotypic sex; for example, XX males or XY females (see androgen insensitivity syndrome). Additionally, an abnormal number of sex chromosomes (aneuploidy) may be present, such as Turner's syndrome, in which a single X chromosome is present, and Klinefelter's syndrome, in which two X chromosomes and a Y chromosome are present, XYY syndrome and XXYY syndrome.[6] Other less common chromosomal arrangements include: triple X syndrome, tetrasomy X, and pentasomy X.
Let's be honest if tomorrow the corporate media complex came out fully in favor of pedophilia you would come out in full defense of it with the most obscure reasonings, "studies", arguments to back it up.Quote:
Originally Posted by Quaoarsking
Uh, no. Children cannot consent to sex. As I already correctly pointed out on this thread, people like you have been unsuccessfully flailing the "pedophilia is next!" slippery slope for decades, and it's always been stupidly wrong, and always will be, since informed consent is the keystone of loosening up moralists laws about sex.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rex54
Can they consent to puberty blockers?Quote:
Originally Posted by Quaoarsking