Sawyer Robertson time

Printable View

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

11-19-2022, 03:56 PM
parabrave

Quote:

Originally Posted by Todd4State

"Fireable offense".

People need to understand that these are freshman and they need time to develop unless they are a phenom like Peyton Manning.

This. He was in with the rest of the 3rd stringers. Do the backups get many reps during practice? Who is the QB coach who is responsible for QB development\?
11-19-2022, 04:06 PM
msstate7

Quote:

Originally Posted by Quaoarsking

I don't care how "exciting" or "boring" our offense is as long as we win games at the Mullen Baseline Level (MBL) or better.

I wouldn't care either if we were winning at a high level, but we aren't. We're right where Moorhead was

Moorhead 14-12 (.538)
Leach 18-17 (.514)
Mullen (.600)
11-19-2022, 04:13 PM
DownwardDawg

Quote:

Originally Posted by TrapGame

Almost two years in the system and he's still this bad. Wow. 4* kid that broke records at his high school.

Myles Brennan broke all of Dylan Farvres records. Both were outstanding in college. ****
11-19-2022, 04:20 PM
msu15

Quote:

Originally Posted by parabrave

This. He was in with the rest of the 3rd stringers. Do the backups get many reps during practice? Who is the QB coach who is responsible for QB development\?

3rd stringers get no reps outside of scout team, and Leach is the QB coach.
11-19-2022, 04:22 PM
msu15

Quote:

Originally Posted by DownwardDawg

Myles Brennan broke all of Dylan Farvres records. Both were outstanding in college. ****

Ol' Dylan. I knew he was transferring about 4 months before most everyone else because I had a class with him that fall semester and he showed up a whopping "Zero" times. At least he was consistent lol!
11-19-2022, 04:23 PM
Turfdawg67

Quote:

Originally Posted by msstate7

I wouldn't care either if we were winning at a high level, but we aren't. We're right where Moorhead was

Moorhead 14-12 (.538)
Leach 18-17 (.514)
Mullen (.600)

We are definitely right where DM was in year 3:

Mullen: 21-17 - 9-15
Leach (projected): 18-18 - 10-16
(Throw in a New Mexico, Tulane & Alabama A&M and take out UGA, Vandy for 2020 Covid year and here are your records)

Mullen: 21-17 - 9-15
Leach- 21-18 - 9-15
11-19-2022, 04:24 PM
CaptainObvious

Quote:

Originally Posted by Leeshouldveflanked

And we see why Sawyer don?t get on the field

Will is it. And no doubt that Lovertich is the backup. He looked smoother on his 2 drives behind the 2?s then Robertson did. 1/3 of our special teams still sucks. After today, we now have 6 punts that have traveled less than 20 yards. We never got a kickoff into the end zone today with no wind blowing. And we had 9 kickoffs. Missed a 49 yards field by about 9 yards. The return team is outstanding.
11-19-2022, 04:27 PM
msu15

Quote:

Originally Posted by Turfdawg67

We are definitely right where DM was in year 3:

Mullen: 21-17 - 9-15
Leach (projected): 18-18 - 10-16
(Throw in a New Mexico, Tulane & Alabama A&M and take out UGA, Vandy for 2020 Covid year and here are your records)

Mullen: 21-17 - 9-15
Leach- 21-18 - 9-15

Throw in at NC State as well for 21-19. Conference record would be the same though. I would argue Leach has had a tougher conference schedule because Mullen's first three years were before expansion.
11-19-2022, 04:30 PM
msstate7

Quote:

Originally Posted by Turfdawg67

We are definitely right where DM was in year 3:

Mullen: 21-17 - 9-15
Leach (projected): 18-18 - 10-16
(Throw in a New Mexico, Tulane & Alabama A&M and take out UGA, Vandy for 2020 Covid year and here are your records)

Mullen: 21-17 - 9-15
Leach- 21-18 - 9-15

Did they start at the same point?

3 years prior to mullen: 15-22
3 years prior to leach: 22-16
11-19-2022, 04:32 PM
msu15

Quote:

Originally Posted by msstate7

Did they start at the same point?

3 years prior to mullen: 15-22
3 years prior to leach: 22-16

I won't argue, especially when you consider the fact that Mullen had a grand total of FOUR scholarship receivers in his first spring practice. Had to convert DB's and walk on QB's just to get reps.
11-19-2022, 04:34 PM
msstate7

Quote:

Originally Posted by msu15

Throw in at NC State as well for 21-19. Conference record would be the same though. I would argue Leach has had a tougher conference schedule because Mullen's first three years were before expansion.

Lol, mullen had the toughest schedule in the country year #1. Year 2, auburn was national champs, lsu #8, bama #10, and ark #12. In year 3, bama #1, lsu #2, and ark #5
11-19-2022, 04:37 PM
BuckyIsAB****

Quote:

Originally Posted by Homedawg

He didn't need to

And there is 3 safeties too.
11-19-2022, 04:48 PM
BiscuitEater

Sawyer .....

Quote:

Originally Posted by BuckyIsAB****

And there is 3 safeties too.

2 of 6 for 5 yards! Amazing just amazing!
11-19-2022, 04:55 PM
Quaoarsking

Quote:

Originally Posted by msstate7

I wouldn't care either if we were winning at a high level, but we aren't. We're right where Moorhead was

Moorhead 14-12 (.538)
Leach 18-17 (.514)
Mullen (.600)

Moorhead had major off-the-field issues and had squandered a team with 3 first round picks on it. The fact that he won some anyway almost saved his job, but we all knew it was only going to get worse. Leach at least seems like he will keep up the MBL.
11-19-2022, 04:58 PM
Really Clark?

Quote:

Originally Posted by msu15

Throw in at NC State as well for 21-19. Conference record would be the same though. I would argue Leach has had a tougher conference schedule because Mullen's first three years were before expansion.

That's a losing argument. The SEC West in 2010-2011 was historically the most difficult division ever in college football. Throw in SOS for his first year in 2009...Mullen's first 3 years was a lot more difficult. It's not close.
11-19-2022, 05:03 PM
Turfdawg67

Quote:

Originally Posted by msstate7

Lol, mullen had the toughest schedule in the country year #1. Year 2, auburn was national champs, lsu #8, bama #10, and ark #12. In year 3, bama #1, lsu #2, and ark #5

Not sure what's funny: 2020- Bama#1, TAM#4 & UGA#7; 2021- Bama#2, OM#11, UK#21, Ark#21 & TAM#26; 2022- UGA#1, Bama#6, LSU#8 & OM#14

That's pretty tough too.
11-19-2022, 05:05 PM
msu15

Quote:

Originally Posted by msstate7

Lol, mullen had the toughest schedule in the country year #1. Year 2, auburn was national champs, lsu #8, bama #10, and ark #12. In year 3, bama #1, lsu #2, and ark #5

Lol, Houston and Georgia Tech had a lot to do with his year one schedule, but I shouldn't have jumped in to your debate. Your iQ isn't high enough to carry on a conversation with.
11-19-2022, 05:07 PM
Turfdawg67

Quote:

Originally Posted by Really Clark?

That's a losing argument. The SEC West in 2010-2011 was historically the most difficult division ever in college football. Throw in SOS for his first year in 2009...Mullen's first 3 years was a lot more difficult. It's not close.

Lol... again, see above. You act like Leach has played a simple schedule compared to Mullen. You only mention the West, Leach has faced a juggernaut in UGA in 2 of 3 years where Dan played horrible UK teams and Vandy.
11-19-2022, 05:10 PM
Percho

Quote:

Originally Posted by tcdog70

Guess you would rather have Billy Napier? How can you bitch after this game.. or maybe Jimbo.

They, [B]would have given,[B] their right ----------- a few years ago.

0, zero, naught patience!
11-19-2022, 05:35 PM
R2Dawg

Quote:

Originally Posted by msstate7

I wouldn't care either if we were winning at a high level, but we aren't. We're right where Moorhead was

Moorhead 14-12 (.538)
Leach 18-17 (.514)
Mullen (.600)

Hey, don't bring facts in here.

Well we are better culture wise I think than Moorhead.

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page