Originally Posted by
Johnson85
The county jobs would create a big special interest group against consolidation, but I'm not sure how many counties are close enough in size and functionality to allow politics for consolidation to begin with. Not that Madison or Hinds are counties that need to be consolidated, but Madison County would obviously fight tooth and nail not to be consolidated with Hinds and its dysfunction. Forrest and Lamar maybe could be consolidated since hattiesburg is in parts of each, but I'm guessing Lamar is less dysfunctional than Forrest and probably wouldn't want to be consolidated with it? The three coastal counties could maybe consolidate, but I'm not sure Jackson or Hancock would want to because of a concern that between the votes in Biloxi and Gulfport and the central geographic location, that Harrison would end up dominating the consolidated county. Would there be a similar concern with the norther three counties?
If you tried to consolidate north and south instead of across the coast and say consolidate Stone with Harrison or George with Jackson county, I think they'd have the same concern about being dominated by larger population centers to the south. I guess Pearl River and Hancock are close enough in size that it might work, and that's probably when you'd get into the political fights over jobs, because the natural geographic location for county government would be picayune.
I'm sure there are some counties where consolidation would at least make sense as far as population and political makeup. Maybe Leake and Neshoba? Smith, Jasper, and Clarke? Rankin and Simpson? Sunflower and Leflore? I'd be curious as to how many people on here live in a county that is adjacent to a county they would be willing to throw their lot in with.