So you think it's all on Fitz? Coaching, WRs, Oline are no part of it?
Printable View
I'll point out increased SEC revenues and the increase in the number of bowls. See below to see how relatively easy it is to get into a bowl these days. You can't compare the Kang's reign versus Mullen's because they coached in different eras.
"To appreciate the rise to 40 bowl games, it's helpful to see the historic trend. In 1955 there were just six bowl games. Over the years, that number has steadily increased: to 11 games by 1975, 18 by 1995, 35 by the end of the Bowl Championship (BCS) era in 2013, and 40 by 2015. That's an increase in bowl games of about 567% over 60 years."
I give Mullen his props and say that he is a serviceable coach. He isn't elite. Elite coaches don't leave schools where the cupboard is stocked (as some here think of our team's talent) to take over any perceived program they think is better. They don't want to acknowledge he was headed to UT before UF called.
Well you are belittling what he did and yeah I can compare em. And Jackie only played 7 league games too. So there's that. You don't have to like dan, he was a dickhead, but what he did with our program was successful. Hard to argue w that. Even though you want to say we regressed from year to year. Hell, you called going 6-7 to 9 wins regression so ......
Our history sucks. Your expectations are low. I want better. This ain’t it. But Mullen had reach his ceiling. A better recruiter that can coach can win more than Mullen. High school coaches in Mississippi hated Mullen. A bunch of them did. I talked to one that played at State. He personally told me that he would never allow one of his players to go to state as long as Mullen was there.