Spirit Chuck

Printable View

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

07-21-2018, 02:52 PM
Todd4State

Quote:

Originally Posted by CadaverDawg

Ole Miss is a dingleberry on the ass of the SEC. They're like a bank robber that created some elaborate scheme, but could have earned the same amount of money by applying their brainpower to honest work, and avoided jail time. Always trying to cut corners, and get from point a to b in a dishonest way. They spend more effort cheating than they do doing things the right way, and still don't ever win Championships. That program and its fans do not deserve one single ounce of success. They're dirty, dishonest, corner cutters, and the NCAA should be ashamed of themselves for the light sanctions they handed down. They showed no backbone to a snake of a program. And Ross Bjork is a cockroach...how the hell has he survived all of this? He has 9 lives and is a prime example of how awful Ole Miss is for letting him stick around despite his lack of control and willingness to turn a blind eye and help cover up cheating. Hopefully karma catches up one day, but I'll believe it when I see it

You know the answer. Because Bjork is willing to play the game with their boosters. That's the main reason why Luke is even the coach now.

As you said they refuse to do things the honest way. Even though that would yield better results for them. Their boosters just can't help themselves- they HAVE to have a hand in getting player x away from MSU and they have to be overly involved in the program. It's pretty terrible and embarrassing.
07-21-2018, 02:55 PM
Todd4State

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bass Chaser

I don't know why Tay Rowland would be considered a booster?

Because even if you are a casual fan of a school even if you didn't go there the NCAA considers you a booster. That way people like Ole Miss can't use their sidewalk fans to buy off players for them without getting into trouble. So, it's probably a good rule.
07-21-2018, 04:06 PM
Goldendawg

Quote:

Originally Posted by robert

Guy should turn his computer over to NCAA Investigators for a few days....since there is nothing to see here, only a minor infraction, then everyone can move on. lol

Already turned it over to Hillary's staff and the FBI. Nothing left to see here!
07-21-2018, 04:12 PM
Goldendawg

Quote:

Originally Posted by CadaverDawg

Ole Miss is a dingleberry on the ass of the SEC. They're like a bank robber that created some elaborate scheme, but could have earned the same amount of money by applying their brainpower to honest work, and avoided jail time. Always trying to cut corners, and get from point a to b in a dishonest way. They spend more effort cheating than they do doing things the right way, and still don't ever win Championships. That program and its fans do not deserve one single ounce of success. They're dirty, dishonest, corner cutters, and the NCAA should be ashamed of themselves for the light sanctions they handed down. They showed no backbone to a snake of a program. And Ross Bjork is a cockroach...how the hell has he survived all of this? He has 9 lives and is a prime example of how awful Ole Miss is for letting him stick around despite his lack of control and willingness to turn a blind eye and help cover up cheating. Hopefully karma catches up one day, but I'll believe it when I see it

Three things that live through a worldwide nuclear holocaust: Cockroaches, UNM boosters, and Keith Richards! Hail State!
07-21-2018, 04:54 PM
Bully13

One of the problems I see with this is how tech is advancing where folks can set up fake accounts just to bust another school. Hell, videos can be altered these days.
07-21-2018, 05:28 PM
ShotgunDawg

Quote:

Originally Posted by CadaverDawg

Ole Miss is a dingleberry on the ass of the SEC. They're like a bank robber that created some elaborate scheme, but could have earned the same amount of money by applying their brainpower to honest work, and avoided jail time. Always trying to cut corners, and get from point a to b in a dishonest way. They spend more effort cheating than they do doing things the right way, and still don't ever win Championships. That program and its fans do not deserve one single ounce of success. They're dirty, dishonest, corner cutters, and the NCAA should be ashamed of themselves for the light sanctions they handed down. They showed no backbone to a snake of a program. And Ross Bjork is a cockroach...how the hell has he survived all of this? He has 9 lives and is a prime example of how awful Ole Miss is for letting him stick around despite his lack of control and willingness to turn a blind eye and help cover up cheating. Hopefully karma catches up one day, but I'll believe it when I see it

This post is absolutely, 100%, dead ass on.

The culture of that school & program disables them from being able build a sustainable winner.

They may have spikes, where they are really good in 3-5 year stints, but they are not capable of sustaining it. Nothing about the way that school & the culture of that program works, will allow it.
07-21-2018, 06:21 PM
RocketDawg

Quote:

Originally Posted by Todd4State

Because even if you are a casual fan of a school even if you didn't go there the NCAA considers you a booster. That way people like Ole Miss can't use their sidewalk fans to buy off players for them without getting into trouble. So, it's probably a good rule.

I don't think being a casual fan makes you a booster. It takes a bit more than that. Here's what the NCAA says a booster is: https://www.ncaa.org/sites/default/f...efinitions.pdf
07-21-2018, 07:17 PM
Dawgology

Quote:

Originally Posted by RocketDawg

I don't think being a casual fan makes you a booster. It takes a bit more than that. Here's what the NCAA says a booster is: https://www.ncaa.org/sites/default/f...efinitions.pdf

If you have bought season tickets you are a booster.
07-21-2018, 07:25 PM
robert

Quote:

Originally Posted by RocketDawg

I don't think being a casual fan makes you a booster. It takes a bit more than that. Here's what the NCAA says a booster is: https://www.ncaa.org/sites/default/f...efinitions.pdf

The link defines Division III Booster....may be the same for Division I but maybe not because the two are so different..(No scholarships in D-III)
07-21-2018, 07:35 PM
Bully13

Somebody needs to review the season ticket holding records or any other alumni backed organization records before they are purged. On 2nd thought, I bet somebody's already got that.
07-21-2018, 07:41 PM
robert

I think the rule for D-I is you are considered a "Booster" if you have ever bought a ticket.....I imagine the Tay person has many selfies at o/m games (football, baseball basketball) Fb...I do not think there will take much to prove he is a booster.
07-21-2018, 07:58 PM
Bully13

Quote:

Originally Posted by robert

I think the rule for D-I is you are considered a "Booster" if you have ever bought a ticket.....I imagine the Tay person has many selfies at o/m games (football, baseball basketball) Fb...I do not think there will take much to prove he is a booster.

https://s33.postimg.cc/wadbtzfxr/Wool_heavy.jpg
07-21-2018, 08:02 PM
msubullylady

I am sorry, but after a long 30 year career of teaching jr high students, 13-14 yr olds would be 8th possibly 9th at best.... run a private “chat” room?! They have a hard time thinking at this age much less being “grown up” to carry on adult conversation long enough w/o “what up Dawg” “Lol” and mis-spelled words up the ying/yang. A few are quite exceptional yes; Tay is not 13 nor is he 14.... shoe size possibly. :-)
07-21-2018, 08:13 PM
Mimi's Babies

Quote:

Originally Posted by msubullylady

I am sorry, but after a long 30 year career of teaching jr high students, 13-14 yr olds would be 8th possibly 9th at best.... run a private “chat” room?! They have a hard time thinking at this age much less being “grown up” to carry on adult conversation long enough w/o “what up Dawg” “Lol” and mis-spelled words up the ying/yang. A few are quite exceptional yes; Tay is not 13 nor is he 14.... shoe size possibly. :-)

Preach it..... When one cannot get them to pay attention for 45 minutes.....
07-21-2018, 08:16 PM
Bully13

17 Yr Old 4 Star Football Player to Other 17 Yr Old 4 Star Player: " Hear about that Private Ole Miss Website for Football Players?"
07-21-2018, 09:48 PM
RocketDawg

Quote:

Originally Posted by msubullylady

I am sorry, but after a long 30 year career of teaching jr high students, 13-14 yr olds would be 8th possibly 9th at best.... run a private “chat” room?! They have a hard time thinking at this age much less being “grown up” to carry on adult conversation long enough w/o “what up Dawg” “Lol” and mis-spelled words up the ying/yang. A few are quite exceptional yes; Tay is not 13 nor is he 14.... shoe size possibly. :-)

I don't find it unfeasible for 13-14 years olds (I think he actually mentioned the age group to be 13-17 in his diatribe) to run a chat room; I just find it unfeasible that they'd have one discussing college football recruiting and talking about recruiting inducements that are not allowed.
07-21-2018, 10:24 PM
Todd4State

Quote:

Originally Posted by msubullylady

I am sorry, but after a long 30 year career of teaching jr high students, 13-14 yr olds would be 8th possibly 9th at best.... run a private “chat” room?! They have a hard time thinking at this age much less being “grown up” to carry on adult conversation long enough w/o “what up Dawg” “Lol” and mis-spelled words up the ying/yang. A few are quite exceptional yes; Tay is not 13 nor is he 14.... shoe size possibly. :-)

I agree. Why the heck would anyone allow a bunch of 14 year olds to run a chat room when I would imagine most chat rooms are free? If a 14 year old- or 40 year old for that matter asked me to let them use my chat room I would tell them to get their own.

It's such a lame excuse. He just needs to go radio silent at this point.
07-21-2018, 10:24 PM
Todd4State

Has anyone wondered if Yancy was a part of these chats? That would be hilariously awesome and fitting.
07-21-2018, 10:49 PM
TrapGame

Quote:

Originally Posted by Todd4State

Has anyone wondered if Yancy was a part of these chats? That would be hilariously awesome and fitting.

He was only there for the 14 and 15 year olds.***
07-22-2018, 08:06 AM
Bully13

My son's 14. I'm gonna ask him a hypothetical scenario question and get his take. Should be good.

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page