How about my posts?Quote:
Originally Posted by Coach34
Printable View
How about my posts?Quote:
Originally Posted by Coach34
The guy blew by Q like he wasn’t even there. He could have done a much better job of making sure he got a foul call. What he did was awful and damn near cost us the game. Especially after his turnover up 4 with 25 seconds left
Exactly.Quote:
Originally Posted by Coach34
Not the first time he's given up a big 3 like that at the end of the game. If he switches to Vandy's guy at the buzzer he probably misses that game winner. Then we aren't forcing ourselves to win out like we are now.
You can't say with a straight face that you haven't seen that called a foul ALOT. Come on, man. Even your boy Liverpool said he grabbed him? What else did you want him to do? Give him a reach- around? aKA risk am intentional foul?Quote:
Originally Posted by Coach34
He did was he was supposed to do. And, guess what? We won. If he did more, we risk losing and this board imploding.
Put a body on him. Don't give him a free lane to the 3pt lane.Quote:
Originally Posted by Covercorner2
ThisQuote:
Originally Posted by stalkingpoon
So risk an intentional foul? Got it.Quote:
Originally Posted by stalkingpoon
Tell me the last time you saw a guy hockey check someone in that scenario. I'll wait...
Especially 30 feet from the basket. You think he got "blew by?" Trying to set your feet a take charge in that scenario would have been even worse.
Hockey check? No. Step in front of him, don't let him run past you and grab his hips. It's called a blocking foul. Not uncommon. I really don't see how anyone thinks that is good defense. The refs weren't gonna call that hand checking stuff at the end with us up by 3.
Ok, well the announcers and the guys on the sec network hat have forgotten more about basketball than you or I will ever know disagree.Quote:
Originally Posted by Liverpooldawg
Exactly.Quote:
Originally Posted by stalkingpoon
Lmao. A for effort. So, instead of getting "blown by," you wanted him to take a charge 30 feet out? You can't be serious.Quote:
Originally Posted by stalkingpoon
Yes, "hand checks" are called fouls when down under a minute the majority of the time. You have all night to watch other games and see.
Did it get called, and not called intentional? If so then it was a good play. If not he screwed up.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jarius
In that situation that is eactly what you want him to do. If he had its game over we win. Jeez man, you can't be THAT...... well.Quote:
Originally Posted by Covercorner2
He wasn't blown by. He just failed to guard him. He reached for him when he went by. And no not a charge, just saying stepping in front of the ball handler isn't going to get you an intentional foul. Don't get so hurt. We aren't saying he's a terrible player. It is just that his defense almost lost us another critical game.
It was a mistake from the refs. It happens. And most of the time we understand. Unless you have other motives or are just clueless or both.Quote:
Originally Posted by Liverpooldawg
OK, man you're right. It's takes a charge to send a guy to the line. You're right.Quote:
Originally Posted by Liverpooldawg
If he stayed in front of him, it’s a common blocking foul- not intentional.
So you have to "stay in front of him" to send a guy to the line late? I must be watching a different game.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bulldog1
Get in front of him and th ref doesn't matter as muchQuote:
Originally Posted by Covercorner2