Lamar Jackson declares for NFL draft

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Homedawg

28 please pull those passing stats you speak of pal..... should be good.

---

Talk about reading. I posted all of his stats earlier vs Dak. Scroll back up

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by bulldawg28

Talk about reading. I posted all of his stats earlier vs Dak. Scroll back up

---

Yes you did..... so show me in those stats posted where he, lamar, was even with dak, much less twice as good. Hell he never ever completed 60% of his passes. Ever!! So again, I ask for you to post the stats where lamar is BETTER than dak. I won't even ask for twice as good anymore. Just please try. Were the stats close? Yep. But dak's were better. Yep. I hate it when stats agree w me. But continue to argue if you will

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Homedawg

Yes you did..... so show me in those stats posted where he, lamar, was even with dak, much less twice as good. Hell he never ever completed 60% of his passes. Ever!! So again, I ask for you to post the stats where lamar is BETTER than dak. I won't even ask for twice as good anymore. Just please try. Were the stats close? Yep. But dak's were better. Yep. I hate it when stats agree w me. But continue to argue if you will

---

You accept a small portion of the data. That portion is the ONLY piece Dak leads and only by 300 yards. That's as ignorant as it gets. The entire body of work is clear and anyone outside MSU homer glasses sees it. Let's see if he is drafted before Dak in the 4th round. If your facts are correct he's a free agent or 5th round at best.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by bulldawg28

You accept a small portion of the data. That portion is the ONLY piece Dak leads and only by 300 yards. That's as ignorant as it gets. The entire body of work is clear and anyone outside MSU homer glasses sees it. Let's see if he is drafted before Dak in the 4th round. If your facts are correct he's a free agent or 5th round at best.

---

What small portion? Better comp rate? More yards. More td. Less int. Better qb rating even though the qb rating includes running. Wow. Yeah I've missed it. Dude you've come to a fun fight w a damn pocket knife. Find once where I said lamar wasn't good. Once. I said dak was a better college passer. And your stupid ass continues to argue. But again carry on.
ETA, I never said he wouldn't be drafted higher than dak. I said he was t Pryor, don't think he will be a good NFL qb. With that said, that won't be proven for a few years. What is proven is that dak was a better college passer in almost every category!!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by bulldawg28

Let's get this straight. Your argument is less means more. So how would you possibly compare what Lamar did against SEC schools if he only played 5 games against them? His record against ranked teams is better than Dak's.

---

1. I don't know what "less means more" means. My argument is dak was a better passer in college than Jackson and put up better numbers despite taking less snaps.

2. He played 7 sec teams. That's 18% of his games. Plenty large enough sample size.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by confucius say

1. I don't know what "less means more" means. My argument is dak was a better passer in college than Jackson and put up better numbers despite taking less snaps.

2. He played 7 sec teams. That's 18% of his games. Plenty large enough sample size.

---

Don't start letting FACTS get in the way of his argument. It's amazing really.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by confucius say

1. I don't know what "less means more" means. My argument is dak was a better passer in college than Jackson and put up better numbers despite taking less snaps.

2. He played 7 sec teams. That's 18% of his games. Plenty large enough sample size.

---

18% is a large percentage of what total number ? What are you smoking? Biased much? Keep up the good work homer.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Homedawg

What small portion? Better comp rate? More yards. More td. Less int. Better qb rating even though the qb rating includes running. Wow. Yeah I've missed it. Dude you've come to a fun fight w a damn pocket knife. Find once where I said lamar wasn't good. Once. I said dak was a better college passer. And your stupid ass continues to argue. But again carry on.
ETA, I never said he wouldn't be drafted higher than dak. I said he was t Pryor, don't think he will be a good NFL qb. With that said, that won't be proven for a few years. What is proven is that dak was a better college passer in almost every category!!

---

The last i checked they both play Qb. It consists of running and passing. If your brain cant comprehend that numbers show Jackson is better your on the lines of a 5 year old. You win.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by bulldawg28

The last i checked they both play Qb. It consists of running and passing. If your brain cant comprehend that numbers show Jackson is better your on the lines of a 5 year old. You win.

---

The thread was started about Lamar turning pro. Thus, the emphasis on passing!! If you think running and passing as a qb in he the NFL are equal I can't help you. But no worries, Lamar was the batter passer in college ********

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by bulldawg28

18% is a large percentage of what total number ? What are you smoking? Biased much? Keep up the good work homer.

---

18% is a "large enough" sample size. You take stats? It is not merely a coincidence that in his 7 sec games his numbers were much worse on the average than the other 32 games.