Sign and Place

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by smootness

I'm not saying that shouldn't be a priority. I'm saying it doesn't make sense to sign 25 just to sign 25, which is absolutely what you were advocating.

---

At no point in time have I said "sign 25 guys just to sign 25 guys". In fact I have already told you once in this thread that I have not said that ever yet you keep saying I am. Are we still having the Sanderson Center conversation from 2012 here?

Who was that guy that dicked us over and went to Texas Am last year. That one hurt cause that dude was pretty good.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by smootness

I'm not saying that shouldn't be a priority. I'm saying it doesn't make sense to sign 25 just to sign 25, which is absolutely what you were advocating. And I'm saying there are definitely times where a sign-and-place is a good use of a spot in a signing class.

---

To add to this if you only have 17 for example, spots to get to the 85 then NOT signing and placing would be, well, stupid! As you stated earlier, we've gotten everyone we placed back....if we wanted them. Some didn't improve and we punted. All good points smoot