Rosebowl had a great podcast today where he talked about some of this. http://www.bulldogsportsradio.com/ep...-day-rankings/
Printable View
Rosebowl had a great podcast today where he talked about some of this. http://www.bulldogsportsradio.com/ep...-day-rankings/
CLIFF NOTES?Quote:
Originally Posted by MSUDawg99
Since all the rebels are here getting their news regarding their NCAA NOA from the most accurate and trusted OM news source, Elitedawgs, I would just like to say welcome and CLICK AN AD!!!!
If everyone gets a show cause, Ole Miss has no choice but to fire him. We they could still pay him, but he couldn't coach.
The real H-bomb would be to show cause everyone. Coaches, and AD's
That would potentially be worse than the death penalty. I suppose since a former AD was involved that wouldn't necessarily be off the table.Quote:
Originally Posted by SheltonChoked
The problem with the whole second letter theory is the fact that the Tunsil violations would not have been included on the original NOA if there was a 2nd NOA coming. That wouldn't make sense.
Why? There's rumored to be plenty more for a second NOA. The fact that the investigation is ongoing tells you there's more. If they were done and no more charges pending then Th investigation would not be ongoing. There's still this entire recruiting class to wade through plus the kimcheech stuff.
At least if the letters are separated by the dates of the violations. That's my biggest problem with the 2nd letter rumors; there is no obvious separation of the allegations since both Tunsil and Saunders seem to be mentioned in this first NOA.Quote:
Originally Posted by Where'sWaldo
every article now says the investigation is still ongoing. If it was over- it would say so and is just waiting on the OM response to the allegations.
If there is still an ongoing investigation, as has been indicated and appears obviously there is one, and if the Tunsil's investigation has been completed, then why couldn't his violations be in the first NOA?Quote:
Originally Posted by Where'sWaldo
I completely agree that the investigation is ongoing. The question isn't whether they are still investigating TSUN, it's whether they already have material that will be part of a 2nd letter (and apparently purposely part of a 2nd letter instead of included in the first NOA). If they have proof of additional allegations, rather than simply still investigating to look for more, why are they waiting to release the info in a 2nd letter? The prevailing theories dealt with the NCAA rules change on how much the staff is to blame (aka, pre- and post-2013 or whenever) or the separation of academic vs other violations, but since Saunders and Tunsil are supposedly mentioned in this first NOA, neither seem like a satisfactory argument.
Y'all have to understand that Tunsil, and Hampton for that matter which should be also included at the same time, are eligibility issues of players already on the team. Those violations are different than actual staff violations which also have different guidlines now. So a separate investigation could overlap the years if the second investigation is centering around the staff and rouge boosters with violations concerning impermissible benefits for recruiting. That would be under the newer guidlines that puts much more emphasis on the head coach controlling the program. Show cause along with LOIC would surround that program with a black cloud.