Can't disagree with that but you know as well as I that it didn't stop people claiming that Mullen was just refusing to play the more "talented" players in those two. People have done this since Mullen has been here. There were those questioning why we were playing a 2 star in Relf in the second year instead of the more talented 4 star Tyler. Mullen was right of course and maybe most programs fans on message boards debate this same thing. I don't know. But he played a bunch of freshman his first year and by the second or third year this argument was being made about this player or that. In the end the coaching staff has been right a lot more than wrong and they have played a lot of young players. But we have not had the luxury of a lot of polished players coming in and were ready to go their first year. There are pluses and minuses to every recruiting tactic. And by concentrating our recruiting here in state, under the radar types, and raw but unrefined athletes, the number who are completely ready to play may be smaller than other schools. But development is part of what many of us love about this program. It's just going to lend to an older average age of player in the program.