Staff Changes

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by StarkVegasSteve

Like I said, "compared to historical norms". Hell Chizik was 5-19 before him and got the Auburn job. He has like the 4th most wins in ISU history. Again, they didn't say he was a good head coach. They said he did good compared to historical norms. I mean Dan McCarney went 56-85 there. Campbell, who most would consider a HELL of a coach, is 57-48. Iowa St is a damn tough job. It's in the middle of nowhere Iowa. And we think recruiting to Starkville is hard.

---

I mean, cool? Like I said, he's not a good head coach. Not sure what this is all about.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by KOdawg1

I mean, cool? Like I said, he's not a good head coach. Not sure what this is all about.

---

I'm just telling you what people who actually supported the program during that time were saying. That's all. I generally try to not look at solely records when judging that stuff. I think Rhoads will be a good addition to the staff and hopefully that will get Turner off the field.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by StarkVegasSteve

I'm just telling you what people who actually supported the program during that time were saying. That's all. I generally try to not look at solely records when judging that stuff. I think Rhoads will be a good addition to the staff and hopefully that will get Turner off the field.

---

Johnny Majors had a losing record and 1 winning season at Iowa St...Pitt hired him from ISU and he was a pretty good coach for Pitt and Tenn

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Really Clark?

Johnny Majors had a losing record and 1 winning season at Iowa St...Pitt hired him from ISU and he was a pretty good coach for Pitt and Tenn

---

Yea I really wasn't trying to turn this into a HC debate. Just passing along info that was told to me by some big time Iowa St guys.

I?ve heard that Rhoads might be the DC in waiting

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BigDawg81

I?ve heard that Rhoads might be the DC in waiting

---

As far as I'm concerned he is the DC now.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Todd4State

As far as I'm concerned he is the DC now.

---

I hope not. I'd have serious questions about whether Rhoads would run a modern defensive scheme.