Printable View
They were not a factor with Derick Hall either, but he went up there and they bad mouthed us the whole time knowing they were not getting him. Auburn was in the hunt and leading most of the way and it may not have made any difference. It is impossible to know. That is how they play in Oxford when they know they are not getting someone.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ifyouonlyknew
OM wasn't who muddied the waters with Derick. Auburn was.Quote:
Originally Posted by 1bigdawg
My "feelings" doesn't have anything to do with it. I would say there's probably a 80% chance we'll lose on Ealy, too.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dawg-gone-dawgs
I disagree...Burrow is a serviceable QB who will be better next year. LSU has elite WR's and now an elite RB. They have been recruiting lights out and I believe they will contend for the west next season.Quote:
Originally Posted by bulldawg28
In order to lose something, you first must have it. We've NEVER had Ealy during this process.Quote:
Originally Posted by NCDawg
Never said we did. The discussion was about who was better-Emery or Ealy.Quote:
Originally Posted by MetEdDawg
Agree on Burrow, but their WRs haven't been elite. They aren't touching Bama next year though. Bama only returns pretty much their entire team.Quote:
Originally Posted by Doggie_Style
Your quote says "There's about an 80% chance we'll lose on Ealy, too".Quote:
Originally Posted by NCDawg
To me the word lose is used entirely too often in recruiting which then incites craziness and perceptions of things being worse than they are. Every year we lose on hundreds of recruits. Did that actually mean we lost them? No it didn't.
Recruiting handled the right way - Nakobe Dean and his familyQuote:
Originally Posted by 1bigdawg
Recruiting handed the wrong way - Derick Hall and his family
That’s the difference.
That's your interpretation-not mine. You chimed in with a post which had nothing to do with the substance of the disagreement between me and the previous poster.Quote:
Originally Posted by MetEdDawg
You do realize everybody is going to lose on Ealy right? He's playing baseball. And right now, I'd say it's 50/50 we sign him.Quote:
Originally Posted by NCDawg
Sounds great. But every word you just was a waste. All I did was comment on your post. You said there's an 80% chance we lose Ealy. I can jump in on whatever the hell topic I want whenever the hell I want to. Welcome to a message board.Quote:
Originally Posted by NCDawg
Yes, I realize that, and I'll drop the subject. I think Ari Gold has more inside knowledge as to what's going on with him than most of us do.Quote:
Originally Posted by Cooterpoot
No one answered my question on Moore. Was his in-home last night or Sunday like someone said?
Moved to SundayQuote:
Originally Posted by Bdawg
But Ari Yancy told me it was shady** I mean hell they camped at his house for two days of course it took bags of cash to lure him away from those crazies**Quote:
Originally Posted by Ari Gold
That's because you're a sunshine pumper.....Quote:
Originally Posted by MetEdDawg
Pickering won't OV MSU, according to Yancy (yes, I know he's full of shit 95% of the time). But he says Pickering has been on MSU's campus so much, that he doesn't feel the need to OV.
He does go on to say that he feels Pickering is MSU bound anyway, but the final 3 weekends, Pickering will OV LSU, Ole Miss, and Bama.
Not worried at all, I just find it interesting. Wish he would come help recruit Young, Mingo, Ealy, and others but I totally get him wanting to take all of his visits.
We absolutely are not missing out on Hall. Camp specimen, not a football player.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ari Gold
I hope this is a joke because how anyone could say us not getting Ealy means we lost him just doesn't pay attention. Charles Moore? Different story. But at no point during Ealy's recruitment has he been committed, indicated he would commit, or been close to pulling the trigger on committing to us.Quote:
Originally Posted by sandwolf
Would it suck to not get him? Maybe? He's not gonna play college football. But how did we lose him? Losing someone insinuates that our staff had him and no longer do. That makes us look worse than the truth of the situation.