I'm going to say that KT will play a role in the Offense. We will see 2 QBs in the backfield....
Printable View
I'm going to say that KT will play a role in the Offense. We will see 2 QBs in the backfield....
I don't understand why anyone would be against it. It seems like more and more people are coming around. People can't say that he should adapt his offense to our players and then be mad when he's trying to bring on a player that fits his system because it may make some players unhappy.
If this was baseball and we needed another really good starting pitcher our fans would be all for it. It wouldn't be "But the team might get mad if Peyton Plumlee is bumped because of this guy."
I just don't understand the logic of our fans sometimes.
He wouldn't start job hunting till after he had secured an impressive season, ie if he had at most 1 loss entering the Bama game. After Bama, yeah he'd check out but this time I think the team was so good they'd still win out vs Arky and OM, so Dan's checking out wouldn't affect the regular season W-L total
Keytaon ain't no Peyton Plumlee is the problem. He's a tad bit better than that. If I thought KT was a back of the bench pitcher I wouldn't be bitching about Joe whoring out to the entire western hemisphere for a Qb.
Damn, it is simple. If you can get a better player--then do it. Joe is here to win. If KT wants to play QB then be better than your competition..
We've seen absolutely nothing that says KT is good. He beat L'Ville, but had a mediocre at best stat line and it was McLaurins 3 INT's that won that game. He had great numbers vs SFA, but KT was late throwing the ball and SFA was literally leaving guys 15 yards open so that's not anything to read into. He looked lost in his small action against A&M, but that's not much data. Moorhead keeping Fitz in vs LSU when he was 4-19 with 3 INT's, so he didn't have much faith in KT at the time. Then Moorhead went after KB indicating he didn't have complete faith in KT to develop. Then KT put up bad numbers in spring camp, and now we're going after Stevens...
And that's it. That's all the data we have on KT either way. He's never had an impressive passing game, he's never put the team on his back and carried them to a victory, he's never made a run that wowed me like Fit'z did his first year as a starter or Dak does every 3rd game in the NFL. He may be a worldbeater and I really hope he is, but there's nothing to support that. We though he'd be one when he was a Fr, but there's no evidence since then to say he is. I don't know either way but the early returns aren't looking good for us honestly
I realize that, but most people who have a closeup view of the team under Mullen know that his offense was not all that mentally challenging. Sort of a power spread, if you will. What Joe runs takes a more cerebral qb. Good route runners.
We lost to Florida for one reason. Dan and Grantham knew how to stop the only offensive weapon we had better than anyone. He knew exactly how Fitz would react in every situation.
Our success under a joe will depend on how he nationally attracts kids who are capable of getting their offensive assignments and keeping Bob Shoop or someone of his caliber running the defense.
Regular fans just want a bowl game and an egg bowl win. This is why last season wasn?t the disaster to them that it was to the message board hero?s.
My prediction is at some point in the season we realize the offense is very effective but low IQ kids, no matter how talented, won?t work in it. In the long run that is good news for MSU. It will remove us from the bidding wars in this state for marginal kids. But we will will be back in the running for an AJ Brown. We never were as long as Mullen was here. Mullen?s offense was the reason we couldn?t land wr recruits.
The bad news is that it will take Joe at least 1-2 more recruiting cycles to build it.
I?m glad Mullen did what he did, but I believe within the next two years we will be glad he moved on.
He was the Gatorade POY in Louisiana his senior year and he didn't get that award from just rushing. He's also set more than half a dozen MSU records already in the 3 games he's played in. Y'all would be fighting like hell if Joe was trying to bench Dak for his PSU boy well I'm doing the same for KT cause I think KT can be that good if he'd just be given a damn chance. Who gives a shit about a spring game performance. I haven't watched a spring game in over a decade because they are totally worthless.
Has been given a chance from the moment he stepped foot on campus. This isn't about a spring game. This is a collective body of work.
46%
6
%
No way around that. This offense won't work with that. It's not Joe's job to appease you. It's to win and to do so in the quickest amount of time. He has an opportunity to get a guy who has been in a system he designed for 3 years. He's 60+% passer and a runner. KT will be fine and will be the starter next year.
Joe does not think you are correct. You are making this judgement on his recruiting profile and 3 games against absolute dog shit defenses where he threw for under 50 % completion % and lost to the worst defense in the country. Joe is making this decision based on his livelihood and seeing the kid every single day for the past year and a half. Do you really believe that you know more about our quarterback situation than one of the best offensive coordinators in college football? Are you that arrogant?
KT is in his 4th year of college. If you have to use him being a high school player of the year to bolster your argument of how good he is, that should tell you all you need to know about what he's actually done in college.
Dak and KT aren't even freaking comparable
In what world is it even remotely not disgusting to use the Fitz broken ankle game where KT was suddenly thrust into a game the opponent was intentionally spearing his ankles as grounds for not starting KT? Are you human?
Freshman/Sophomore Dak & KT are absolutely comparable. Are you high? Dak didn't really become Dak till his junior year.
Yeah it had nothing to do with them having an extremely good starting QB in McSorely. Heisman candidate at that. He sucks because he couldn?t oust him...got it. It was a close competition that McSorley eventually won over Stevens. It wasn?t like he sucked so bad they had no choice but to play McSorley and he just worked out for Penn St
In the world where you try to convince everyone that you have a better grasp on our quarterbacks than Joe Moorhead. When you make stupid arguments you get the fact that KT has done absolutely zero in actual football games to warrant this outrage over our head coach wanting a different quarterback thrown in your face.
The difference in Mullen and Moorhead at this point in their careers at MSU.... is the fan base was starving for wins in Mullen’s first year.
I’m thinking ... it isn’t so much tinkering as Moorhead wants more....: mores production and more wins.
KT has started 3 games. How bout you compare Dak's first 3 started games instead of using an entire season.
Oh so suddenly McSorley is miles better than Fitzgerald now huh
Typical Genespage response. Don't bother ever discussing anything on a message board cause the head coach always makes the best decisions cause head coach durrrr. Still a dick move to use KT's game vs Ole Miss as reason to not start him this season too btw and KT would have won that game had our DBs and Grantham learned how to cover anything thrown over 15 yards deep.
Sorry but I disagree that McSorley is better than Fitzgerald but even if he is it's not like he's miles better so the comparison between Stevens situation and KT's is actually quite similar. How do you not see that? And I'm not changing the criteria at all you are by comparing an entire season vs 3 games. That's not a comparison. That's like comparing Rooker's entire last season to Rowdey's first 12 games of this season.
You specifically said KT’s Freshman and Soph YEARS are comparable to Dak’s. Not his first 3 starts (which he hasn’t even had) vs Dak’s first 3 starts. That is the definition of changing the criteria after trying and failing to make a point.
Doesn’t matter that you don’t think McSorley wasn’t any better than Fitz, experts, early Heisman pundits, Vegas, the draft, they all disagree with you
You're making excuses. The dude has not shown he can pass or be a starter. He had a chance to beat out McSorely and couldn't. This spring he couldn't even beat out the current Qb after McSorely graduated hence the reason he's transferring. What are you looking at?