I propose STAR CAP
Take an average of star ratings.
Limit the star ratings that a team can have - five 5 stars
- ten 4 stars
- twenty 3 stars
Something like the above.
Etc.
You do not have to worry about people paying more than a salary cap, etc?pay whatever you want?you are still limited to a certain number of stars.
This would fix it but ?they? do not want it fixed. They want eyeballs on TV. The end.
This would lead to more $ in time though.
Quote:
Originally Posted by cheewgumm
FYI I have proposed this numerous of times and is shot down worst than warm piss. I agree with you fwiw!
Playing devils advocate here:
What is to keep schools from altering or pressuring the people/groups who rate high school athletes, from "de-rating" the normally 5-star athletes to 3 stars? I think this will open up another level of influence peddling and cheating.
I am with you though, that something needs to be done!
Yep... The REC will just have the "Bammer Bump" removed from all the 5 star commits, have em pushed down to 4 stars, then sign more 5 stars, and so on down the line....Quote:
Originally Posted by Extendedcab
That is fine...
Bama ( or whever) can convice 5 or so rating agencies to lower their rankings so they can sign another 4 star guy. Great. That is a lot harder than stopping Bama ( or whever) from paying more than the salary cap.
This is the BEST answer.
Q:
Since NIL is here would it really even matter if they cut scholarships from 85 to 70. Teams can sign as many as they want to NIL deals, correct.
If it's a player with scholarship offers at the same level, they have to count against the number.Quote:
Originally Posted by TALL DAWG
Correct. These guys making scholly reduction suggestions ain't seeing the big picture. Bama will have 100 players if they want them now. Tusk weed money gonna put some kids through college.Quote:
Originally Posted by TALL DAWG