I'm shocked at the lack of weapons/muzzle discipline displayed in that still... I thought they would have had more firearms experience than that...
Printable View
I'm shocked at the lack of weapons/muzzle discipline displayed in that still... I thought they would have had more firearms experience than that...
Ohhh well since they’ve been practicing this for over a month then they should be allowed to perform it, not matter what happened earlier in the week. Thanks for clearing that up
I will assume your google is broken. Because the hate is only going one direction and only one side physically and verbally attacking the other. I think you heard about a softball practice or The Red Hen restaurant. Fhioss are just a couple that come to mind.
I think you are mistaking hate for disagreement because the mainstream has made disagreeable items into hate for their own political purposes. Opposing an ideology or failed policy isn?t hate. Physically intimidating or actually attacking someone can be hate. And quite frankly there is only one side committing those types of acts.
No one physically attacked democrats because they opposed Obama and his failed policies/ideology. They took it to the ballot box like civil individuals. The script flipped on Nov 8, 2016 and we have seen actually physical violence and hate toward the winning side. Albeit most of this is fabricated and paid for by large donors, it?s still does not disprove the facts. Only one side is doing this, and the worst part is the people leading the party are actually donating to funds that pay for the violence.
So I guess they had a plan to show 2 cops getting killed prior to the tragedy and didn't think to edit that part out in light of recent events. I guess if the 2 cops hadn't been killed, everything would have been cool. Sound about right Q?
Yep. Had the cops not been killed, nobody would have given their John Q show a second thought, just like nobody did in August or September.
Nobody interpreted the Famous Maroon Band's "Pirates of the Caribbean" show in 2006 as an endorsement of piracy, but if there had been a major pirate incident during that season and the band stupidly decide to play it anyway, it would have lead to confusion and upset.
You: "Ohhh well since they’ve been practicing this for over a month then they should be allowed to perform it, not matter what happened earlier in the week."
Me: Actually I have repeatedly said that they shouldn't have performed it.
You: Oh, uh, well, uh, uh, uh, you're a moron!!!!1
Don’t know one way or another but I haven’t seeing it stated in the news this has been their regular halftime show. Maybe it has been but I know Forest Hill parents/fans in attendance have publicly come out and condemn the director for the performance as well. Nobody has said it was their regular program however, unless I missed it somewhere
Pointing out how long the show has been in the works was to dispel with the fiction that this show was an intentional reference to the murdered Brookhaven cops. I have been very clear in this thread, from my first post on, that even though it was not referring to them specifically, they still should have been more sensitive and not performed the part of the show from the photo.