No, you don't. Because if you DID want to know that, you would spend 5 minutes on ANY other message board around the SEC and see what THEIR insiders had to say about it. I already GAVE you a method of confirmation. You are just taking the opposite approach for the hell of it.
Where was the "proof" anything was happening between us and Redmond prior to an unreliable source running his mouth about a bunch of crap SIX MONTHS after our investigation had started?Quote:
but outside of message board rumors and a few blog writers, there is no proof that any of that has happened. And I'm actually one of the ones that hopes like hell that it is happening and that we will soon see proof.
No, it isn't. I find it hilarious that you took my every word with recruiting -- much of it privately -- thus knowing that I knew what was happening last year and much of what I knew was NOT coming from message board bs -- yet are defiant that I would know anything about this? What gives?Quote:
But for you and Engie to act like we KNOW all of this shit, is pure horseshit at this point.
So, you want us to out sources on a public message board to "prove" to you that we know what's coming? You are totally off your rocker today man. IDGAF if you or anyone else "believes" that I know what we are talking about. Time will tell.Quote:
And if not, then this is one of those times that I actually hope Engie brings his data to the table, because I don't KNOW shit because none of it is from FACTUAL sources that I have seen.
So, what do you actually want dude? Fowler told you there was an investigation ongoing. All of THEIR insiders confirm it. Ours confirm it, Bama's confirm it, Texas confirms it, Georgia confirms it. You are trying HARD not to see it.Quote:
Everything you guys speak of is message board rumor mill type stuff, and I can't sit here and say "man, I can't wait to see these sanctions" when all I have to go by is a guy on a blog or a message board.
How many times have I said this? Probably not many. Considering 99.9% of actual information comes off a variation of blogs and message boards these days. Is it somehow more valid when Pat Forde "blogs" about it than when the Texas insider at Orangebloods does it? Or the Bama insider at TideInsider? Those guys are PAID to be RIGHT on info that the general public doesn't yet know -- and all of them have SOMEHOW arrived at the same conclusion despite having no OBVIOUS connection to each other. Care to explain that to me?Quote:
How many times have you guys said yourselves that there is tons of bS floating around blogs and message boards.
I've given you the method to figure it out for yourself(now MULTIPLE times). If you choose to deny what John Farley and Paul Jones are continually telling you, along with countless other program insiders, that's your own prerogative. That's ALL I'm giving you. I'm damn sure not outing actual sources on Elitedawgs for a bunch of people looking for a reason not to believe the info anyway.Quote:
Again, not saying YOU guys may not know something. But WE don't know shit to be factual. I would love for you to show it to me so I can KNOW though. That's basically what I'm asking for. So Engie, don't tell me WE KNOW anything unless you can show us how WE KNOW it. Because I think I speak for many on this board that haven't seen this information that proves what you guys say is true. Not saying you select few don't know something, but Please show us how you know these things to be true, and not just tell us that you know....otherwise your saying "WE" know, is just not true