ESPN
Printable View
Or maybe, just maybe, this was the strategy of an agent working for his client, to gain some leverage in possible upcoming contract extension to stay at State.
Hey, I was approached by Oregon to interview and I wanted you to know John that I'm committed to State and want to be here awhile. Great, Dan I appreciate the commitment and we will work something out over the next few months to honor your commitment.
Is it too ****ing hard for us to look at it this way instead of the negative, agenda driven few, and those at OM?
Also funny that this singular source ESPN used that is apparently so knowledgeable about that search had no clue Taggart was a finalist until he was actually hired, since no one reported that anywhere beforehand.
So no where in this do y'all think that what's best for Mullen is what's best for MSU? When this board started it was great because the whole point was to do what's best for Msu and screw Ole Miss. now it seems like we want to out six pack six pack. My point is can't we get back to doing what's best for Msu and screwing ole miss. Seems like more fun to me
And Wolken stated that it was Rhule 1 and Taggert their second choice and the sources on Chip Kelly, Gary Patterson and several other sitting Power 5 coaches in play were an alternate reality. There was nothing to those rumors in the end. Their was one "inside source" who doubted that Taggert was a serious candidate during the time they had agreed the job to him.
And you do realize Cohen could be at fault also by playing damn hardball and forced Mullen and Sextons hand. Give Mullen and extension get him to sign it and then you can say hey look he just signed an extension he isn't going anywhere.
But no instead we try to play damn hardball and have it blow up in our face in recruiting.
I don't think Mullen wants to leave. I think Mullen just likes to look at his options & feel things out.
If Mullen truly wanted to leave, he'd be long gone by now. The fact that he's still hear after being a candidate for so many jobs, tells me that he likes to listen, but no one ever meets what he wants.
We don't report rumors unless its title "rumor" or "I'm hearing" or "adding two plus two it could be." I'm not sure where that's coming from. Media reported Mullen's name with Oregon. Period. Posters here put it on the board.
Last year was different because there was a deal in place until Richt got canned. He was as good as gone, but he got the rug pulled out from under him. It created a mess in the athletic department and with our upper management at the school, which is probably (see.. <--- unconfirmed here), in part, why we saw turnover this year from a lifelong State guy. The money and opportunity were probably the main reasons, but dealing with this BS every year wears on people (including the Mullen's, Keenum's, and now the Cohen tribe).
Mullen and group handled this rumor by far the best in his 8 years. No comment of a foolish rumor.
Mullen has stated the same answer to the same question every year, "I want comment on rumors", why can't folks especially Msu fans get this? But yet, "the agenda folks" want to continue to find ways to bash a Coach who has been successful for 8 years overall and fixing to be 9. Eventually some will get it right, after all the play station games can be played over and over to you finally win.
Now back to hopefully a win in a bowl game.
What's the sources saying on Dan's contract extension?