Originally Posted by
defiantdog
What?! Dak actually had meaningful snaps against real teams when he was a redshirt. Fitz is good, but he's had reps against Northwestern State and Troy. Dak also had receivers that were barely tall enough to ride a roller coaster, while Fitz and Staley have future NFL players out there. Dak was used as a running back that could throw the ball his redshirt year. But he had meaningful snaps that were crucial to the game. Fitz and Staley have the potential to be really good, but they haven't served the same importance Dak did as a freshmen. Therefore, you cannot say they are A LOT BETTER than Dak.