yes,he is saying that
Printable View
yes,he is saying that
this
I would take Arnold if it was for cheap and knowing that he would be the backup but somebody will pay him good money to be the starter.
Wait. You're saying we evaluated KT and knew he was going to be the number 2 behind Shapen and we STILL went and spent significant 6 figures on LK?? That would have been incredibly dumb of us to spend that kind of money on a guy we knew would be our 3rd string QB.
I'm saying overspending on a 3rd string qb for a team on a budget is stupid. If we had unlimited funds, sure spend significant money on LK.
But we lost out on the OL who went to TT because we were short on the money. Take the money that went to LK and give it to that OL and we our much better.
None of that matters. Our coaches decided he was the clear Number 2 ahead of LK from the first game on.
That's all this conversation is about - whether we should have spent significant money on a third string QB. We should not have. Had we known KT was going to be the clear number 2 there is no way we throw significant money at LK. It was a mistake.
Last time I checked Taylor signed last Dec and Hawk signed in Jan. Both went through spring and then fall camp, so your premise is not even close to on point. The staff had seen neither one on our own field yet to even make depth chart call when they were signed.
You are the king of knowing things that aren't true and a master of selective hindsight when it come to picking apart your perceived inadequacies of this staff.
We didn't overspend on a 3rd team QB at the time of signings. We did not pay KT much and given he was a raw HS QB playing in a limited system at Nox, he was the 3rd team QB we paid. Now, you can argue we overpaid our 2nd team QB at the time of signing, but given the circumstances (Shapen injury prone and a HS guy) we had to pay him what it costs to get him.
Here is the deal on a backup QB, we can't afford to have a quality backup. We just can't. We have to find a decent Juco or DII QB that is willing to come and play on the cheap.
If KT goes down, what does it matter we aren't winning anything. I would rather go extremely cheap at Backup QB, if it means we can use that money towards an impact DL, OL or WR.
You hope to get lucky like the bears did and find a QB that can be serviceable.
We cannot pay a third string QB the amount of money we paid Kro this past year. IT is inexcusable moving forward.
I'm not sure who your source is on this, but you are wrong. Georgia offered him last year and made a very strong NIL offer to him. We did a great job stepping up because we knew how rare it is to have an elite talent like KT that actually wants to come to MSU right now. We were his first choice over GA. Do you know how rare that is? So of course we stepped up.
In general, I don't think what you are saying is wrong. I just don't think it applies to where we were in 2025.
We had already seen in 2024 what happens when QB1 goes down and your only option is a True Freshman (MVB) or a RS who hadn't really played (Parson).
Knowing Shapen's injury history, putting ourselves in that position 2 years in a row was not going to cut it. If Shapen had been injured again early in the season we would have been staring down another 2-10 type season.
Bringing in Kro was the right call for 2025. And if I was in Lebby's shoes - coming off a 2-10 season - I'm signing and paying for the best QB I can.
For 2026 we still need a QB2. But, I think because we think KT is durable and can be the guy, and have a pretty solid incoming guy in McWhorter going with a solid FCS/DII/JUCO QB makes sense.
It's all about context