So you think if we over-paid our QBs we would have been better? 😳😳
Printable View
Indiana is an outlier because they struck gold with Cignetti. Selmon turned me off when he didn?t hire him when he had the chance, but the chance of finding a Cignetti really is a needle in a haystack and we have never been able to do that with coaching in any sport outside of maybe Vic Schaefer
If we're going to make a terrible hire at DC we might as well double down and give him a terrible contract to go with it.
We do tend to fall into a pattern of making some bizarre decisions where if our first couple choices don?t work out that we make a panic hire, but there are other good DCs out there who don?t have the resume of Durkin but could still be good options. I still think we should?ve went after Jessie Bobbit or someone who is young and energetic that has been successful at every stop he has been instead of settling and making a panic decision
https://www.essentiallysports.com/nc...c-offer-claim/
aGAIN- post your numbers
It's pretty wild how Lebby supporters will almost always admit that he's not a very good "gameday coach" but when you point out that if he were a good one instead of a bad one we would have gone 7-5 instead of 5-7, they start flailing and namecalling.
He?s not wrong. The thing that everyone has trouble with understanding is how bad the roster was in Lebby?s first year. It has taken an entire portal cycle to field a team that is competitive in the SEC. We spent $15 million this year on a roster that can at least play competitively for 3 quarters in most sec games. Thats where the other $10?$15 million we didn?t spend comes in. The 4th quarter of sec games. We didn?t have the depth to play a sec schedule. And we didn?t have the star power on the d line either.
We got the value for what we paid we didn?t pay enough to finish the job.
LOL!
Bruh, there's a missed field goal and three 15 yard penalties not on Lebby.
And I'll do you one better. We make the field goal vs Tennessee and we win without going into over time.
Hell, if we didn't have a defense in bottom three of the SEC we would have won 7 games.
And despite everything you listed, if he just lines up and kicks the FG instead of calling a questionable pass play against Florida, we probably win. Or at least everyone doesn't blame him so hard for the loss if we miss the FG.
Similarly, all he had to do was run out the clock against Texas and he kept snapping it with 10-20 seconds left on the clock.
Are those the only reasons we lost the games? No. We could have spent more money on a better roster and maybe we could have won those games in spite of Lebby. (Of course, then maybe we're close enough against Missouri and Ole Miss for Lebby to choke those away.) But I don't know if the money problem is ever going to be fixable. The "head coach makes bad decision" problem is fixable, and it's up to Lebby whether it's fixable with him or fixable with a new coach.