If you follow at all this really isn't that hard to figure out. It has all the ear marks of the usual plan.
Printable View
Yes and with or without him, MSU's defense is going to be better than Auburn's and UM's.
Might as well be part of (Defense)U at MSU.
Seems like Ari and IYOK haven't had much info round here lately
When I look at our current class, I see 22 commits b/c we know at least one won't qualify and he might not even sign. Then we have Washington and Emerson who are a little bit up in the air. So we need to have 5 pretty good players set up to recruit and possibly sign b/c you almost have to sign 25 every year. Then looking at our board we have:
1. Hall, our staff seems to have done all you can ask
2. Bedford, haven't heard lately but I expect him to sign with the good guys
3. Mingo, we appear to be running 3rd behind Ole Miss and UGA
4. a Juco DT, haven't heard any names
5. Ealy, sure I think we should sign him if we have room, no real reason not to
Anyone else out there? I hate we didn't recruit Drummond. I would have loved to have him in our rotation and it's not like we can afford to be super choosey.
Drummond doesn’t fit what we want. We got our Juco guy and next year we got at least two more coming.
I put him in the best available category. I think we have a better WR group with him in it next year. I guess the hope is that Whop will make a big jump otherwise it's the same guys. Payton can run a go route, but he was the 3rd option this year at his school. Drummond is a record holder at EMCC.
We don’t have a spot for another Juco WR. And Mingo is the best available WR. Drummond is slow. We’ve got possession guys.
Our list isn’t changing much. Two players maybe, and I think that’s doubtful. One possible qualifying issue. We’re in a good spot. LB is the only spot I’m concerned a little with. Maybe DT depth.
Know what? I’m not looking for replacements for commits I don’t believe are going anywhaere. After signing day, we’ll see.