Texas A&M seems to have found new life

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DownwardDawg

He looked really good tonight. We all know what a great QB can do for you. Jimbo might have bought himself another contract extension from Bjoke.
They have so much talent.

---

Just looked at their depth chart. They're starting 4 Tr Fr on offense, 3 on defense (2 linemen). They had four 5* Dlinemen in their recruiting class this past year.

On offense they're starting one Jr, the rest are Fr and Sophs. On D, they're starting 2 Srs, 3 Jrs, and the rest are Fr and Sophs. Two of the four 5* Fr Dlinemen are starters.

I don't think they'll be a walk in the park next year as some on here seem to think. Especially late in season at their place.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dawgday166

Just looked at their depth chart. They're starting 4 Tr Fr on offense, 3 on defense (2 linemen). They had four 5* Dlinemen in their recruiting class this past year.

On offense they're starting one Jr, the rest are Fr and Sophs. On D, they're starting 2 Srs, 3 Jrs, and the rest are Fr and Sophs. Two of the four 5* Fr Dlinemen are starters.

I don't think they'll be a walk in the park next year as some on here seem to think. Especially late in season at their place.

---

Gotta see what transfer portal does to help/hurt them. They can't lose weigman

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by msstate7

Gotta see what transfer portal does to help/hurt them. They can't lose weigman

---

I would imagine money is not an obstacle to their boosters.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dawgday166

Just looked at their depth chart. They're starting 4 Tr Fr on offense, 3 on defense (2 linemen). They had four 5* Dlinemen in their recruiting class this past year.

On offense they're starting one Jr, the rest are Fr and Sophs. On D, they're starting 2 Srs, 3 Jrs, and the rest are Fr and Sophs. Two of the four 5* Fr Dlinemen are starters.

I don't think they'll be a walk in the park next year as some on here seem to think. Especially late in season at their place.

---

They are gonna be much better next year. The SEC will be even tougher next year. That includes a damn good State team too.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DownwardDawg

They are gonna be much better next year. The SEC will be even tougher next year. That includes a damn good State team too.

---

I'm ok with 1 - 11 as long as we beat OM *******

Seriously tho ... yea it's shaping up to be a tougher year next year. USCe at their place ain't gonna be a walk in the park either I don't think.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dawgday166

I'm ok with 1 - 11 as long as we beat OM *******

Seriously tho ... yea it's shaping up to be a tougher year next year. USCe at their place ain't gonna be a walk in the park either I don't think.

---

Would you prefer UGA or South Carolina?

I would choose South Carolina 100 times out of a 100

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by PikeDawg15

Would you prefer UGA or South Carolina?

I would choose South Carolina 100 times out of a 100

---

Duh ... probably UGA ** I was just saying that everyone seemed to be counting USCe as a sure W two or three weeks ago.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mparkerfd20

LSU losing just knocks us even further down in the bowls. Music City here we come! Sigh

---

Not too far in the past, Dawgs would be happy with any bowl, now times have changed for the better.