That's gold!!Quote:
Originally Posted by smootness
Printable View
That's gold!!Quote:
Originally Posted by smootness
It's stupid to give rings for the egg bowl. Just dumb especially when they sucked donkey balls. But whatever. You have your opinion. I'll have mine. Thanks.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gutter Cobreh
So he had to promise them a ring to get them to win? Hahaha. Hell most of them wanted to pawn it anyway.Quote:
Originally Posted by DownwardDawg
We won. He will be fired soon enough....Quote:
Originally Posted by BuckyIsAB****
You don’t give a ring to someone who made a C when at worst deserved a B. To raise expectations you set higher goals.
Dont jump back on the train if we win this year. Some of yall are wildQuote:
Originally Posted by Homedawg
Not sure what this means. Why would they pawn them?Quote:
Originally Posted by Homedawg
I disagree. I'm not saying it has to be a ring, but I fully support giving smn for beating OM. A parade, a PlayStation, smn.Quote:
Originally Posted by msstate7
Yes.Quote:
Originally Posted by BeardoMSU
And I agree it shouldn't define our season. There are bigger things, such as those you mention. But it should always be a top priority to beat them. Always. Anyrhing to incentivize that and make it s big deal, I'm all for it.
Bitching about this is bitching just to bitch. Some of yall have already dug his grave
Joe can average a 7.1-4.9 regular season here just like dan did and folks will want him gone. That is joes biggest problem.Quote:
Originally Posted by BuckyIsAB****
We will win 7-8 games this year and people will still bitch about 2018Quote:
Originally Posted by confucius say
This is such a false statement. I adjust expectations year-to-year. Last season should've been a 10-win regular season. This season, I expect 6 wins, and won't be mad if we get them.Quote:
Originally Posted by confucius say
It’s always great to be a rival but we don’t recruit to beat 1 team. We don’t play to win 1 game. We play to be special and every team should have the same goals. I don’t believe you give special treatment to anyone who was better because of another’s weakness. It’s about rewarding the long haul, the season. Special deseserves special.Quote:
Originally Posted by confucius say
While I loved the win and don’t agree with the recognition of 1 game I do still believe in the coaches at this point but I don’t believe any team should be recognized for 1 game I believe it has to be recognized for greatness over a whole year
Yeah, rings are for 17n championships. Not beating a 1-7 rival. That is what the rival game trophy is for. You want a ring, stop losing 17n games to Bama and everyone else with a pulse.Quote:
Originally Posted by confucius say
I'm betting MSU had already bought the rings for making the Outback bowl and then Joe decided it was better to label them as Egg Bowl winning rings instead of Outback appearance rings.
You've lost your brain if you think post-injury Fitz is a ten win QB. Just stop.Quote:
Originally Posted by msstate7
If he wins 8 next year I’ll be shocked and he’ll regain some fan confidence. I think he’s in the 5-7 range. 7 will keep folks happy enough, 6 will keep his job safe but fan base will be very restless, and 5 will be a shitshow. If anything under 5 happens Cohen’s seat gets warm too.Quote:
Originally Posted by BuckyIsAB****
Dug his grave? I want to see one iota of progress beyond keeping our d coordinator from one season to the next for the first time in 6 years.Quote:
Originally Posted by BuckyIsAB****
I want to see our offense work.
I want to see our QB complete 60% of his passes.
I want to see our running game work without running the qb 250 times and our best weapon rb 130 times.
I want to see our QB use his athleticism to buy him time to use his arm.
I will tell you what.....you want rings, give it to them after they 17n do something. UM 17n sucks and we lost to Iowa. Gator bowl doesn't mean shit if you lose it and only got there by beating Kansas State.
We could have beaten UF and maybe UK to get there.Quote:
Originally Posted by Relardo Sidney
+1Quote:
Originally Posted by BeastMan
Dan took over a team that won 4 games... Moorhead took over the most talented roster we?ve possibly ever had. Situations are different.Quote:
Originally Posted by confucius say
YupQuote:
Originally Posted by BeastMan
I could care less about completion percentage or who gets the ball as long as we win. And we will win. Its going to be ok. Moorhead will be fine. You can blame Daniel Mullen for running off the DC's. Mullen's offense didnt piss a drop in a lot of games vs Bama, LSU, either. He also lost to Northwestern in the gator bowl so...Quote:
Originally Posted by Lord McBuckethead
YawnQuote:
Originally Posted by preachermatt83
Ole Miss would have extended Luke had they won the game so dont let them tell you shit. This board wouldve went full nuclear had we lost.
You mean the same roster that Dan won 8 games with in 2017?Quote:
Originally Posted by preachermatt83
It was the most talented defensive roster. Unfortunately, the offense left a lot to be desired at WR and QB.
I didn't mean you specifically.Quote:
Originally Posted by msstate7
Don't forget, many wanted dan gone too.
Ok. Take dans first year out and it makes him a 7.38-4.62 coach. The 2010 team had every much if not more talent than the 2019 so it is wash by year two of their respective tenures.Quote:
Originally Posted by preachermatt83
Joe can do the same thing and people will want him gone.
Look, we are all ready to get a team together that is ready to compete every game. You do not have to win every game, just compete. We missed the mark last year. Joe has another opportunity this year.
This board will lose it if fitz is drafted this weekendQuote:
Originally Posted by Dawg2003
I find it funny how the board flipped from the offseason
https://www.elitedawgs.com/showthrea...highlight=Fitz
Why post this?Quote:
Originally Posted by Drugdog
I hope to meet many ex players over the next few years who willQuote:
Originally Posted by vv83
proudly show me their egg bowl ring. I say celebrate every chance you get.
It easy to blame a coaching staff vs the fact we are set up in the West to be last or next to last. We have nowhere near the money facilities or love by the conference. We can dream but we are set up like Mississippi and Arkansas to be lower tier teams in the SEC. And if we rattle the conference cage we will be penalized by key bad calls or investigation by the NCAA. JUst my black helicopter conspiracy thoughts and im guessing im right. We fight about what we need to win the west and I’m gonna say as a 55 yr old man that the 3 I mentioned won’t win the West in the next 20 years
No we couldn't have. Kentucky skull****ed us the entire 4th quarter and Florida just kicked FGs all game instead going for TDs. Mullen coulda won that game by 21-28 but didn't wanna show us up.Quote:
Originally Posted by Lord McBuckethead
Using C34's take as your basis for everyone else is an interesting strategy. Fitz actually only won 7 games last year. He's a below average passer, well below average decision maker passing, below average blitz reader and an elite runner but that never wins you 10 games in the SEC as a Qb no matter if Vegas favors you to.Quote:
Originally Posted by msstate7
I was at both and like Lord we should have beat Florida and with an identity might would of beat UK. You can’t make these assumptions based on a Dunkin Donut employees take!!Quote:
Originally Posted by Relardo Sidney
Guess C34 was the only poster in that thread or you didn't read itQuote:
Originally Posted by Relardo Sidney
Quote:
Originally Posted by msstate7
It's a ten month old thread about how we're gonna win the SEC West. Why would I read that shit? You shouldn't either.